Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0 Openssl PKCS12 patch

2006-12-16 Thread Moritz Bechler
Hi >> Hello, I'm Marc and I'm new to this list. Whew! That was easy! >> >> I've read in the archive about a patch for supporting openssl pkcs12, > > First, thanks for this patch :) Quite nice you did this, I was just thinking about doing it myself ;) > >> but nothing seems to be done so far. Sinc

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0 Openssl PKCS12 patch

2006-12-15 Thread Pierre
Hi Marc, On 12/15/06, Marc Delling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I'm Marc and I'm new to this list. Whew! That was easy! I've read in the archive about a patch for supporting openssl pkcs12, First, thanks for this patch :) but nothing seems to be done so far. Since I was missing the sam

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0 Openssl PKCS12 patch

2006-12-15 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Marc, you cannot use c++ style comments '//', see CODING_STANDARDS. Rest looks good on a first glimpse. best regards marcus Friday, December 15, 2006, 6:27:13 PM, you wrote: > Hello, I'm Marc and I'm new to this list. Whew! That was easy! > I've read in the archive about a patch for su

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0: "Hooks for tracking file upload progress were introduced."

2006-11-27 Thread nick loeve
Hello, As another example an extension i maintain will scan a file on upload using clamav: http://trickie.org/code/phplibclamav.php -- Nick Loeve -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0: "Hooks for tracking file upload progress were introduced."

2006-11-23 Thread Stickman
Thanks for the reply. After submitting the question I came across this page http://blog.bitflux.ch/archive/2006/09/28/ (linked from the PHP docs of course -- must update my local help file!) with an early patch that makes use of these new hooks. However, I suspect we'll wait until something more '

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0: "Hooks for tracking file upload progress were introduced."

2006-11-23 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
They are C-level hooks. The various storage mechanisms need to add support for them in order to expose them to userspace PHP. I added support in pecl/apc, for example. See: http://progphp.com/progress.php (pick some random file in the 200k size range) Source at: http://progphp.com/progress.

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0 release with "broken" input filters

2006-10-25 Thread Pierre
Hello, On 10/26/06, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Haven't read the rant (yet) but, e, have they released Flash anything in this millenium for Linux?... Cuz it seems like I never can manage to get to download anything higher than Flash Player 6 for my Linux box desktop at home. W

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0 release with "broken" input filters

2006-10-25 Thread Richard Lynch
On Mon, October 23, 2006 6:26 pm, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Peter Brodersen wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:38:31 -0700, in php.internals >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rasmus Lerdorf) wrote: >> >>> I had left out SERVER filtering in the initial version for much the >>> same >>> reasoning, but it turns out t

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0 release with "broken" input filters

2006-10-23 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Peter Brodersen wrote: On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:38:31 -0700, in php.internals [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rasmus Lerdorf) wrote: I had left out SERVER filtering in the initial version for much the same reasoning, but it turns out that a good chunk of holes were due to the fact that people used $_SERVER['

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0 release with "broken" input filters

2006-10-23 Thread Peter Brodersen
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:38:31 -0700, in php.internals [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rasmus Lerdorf) wrote: >I had left out SERVER filtering in the initial version for much the same >reasoning, but it turns out that a good chunk of holes were due to the >fact that people used $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'] unfilter

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0 release with "broken" input filters

2006-10-23 Thread Richard Lynch
On Mon, October 23, 2006 12:38 pm, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > I had left out SERVER filtering in the initial version for much the > same > reasoning, but it turns out that a good chunk of holes were due to the > fact that people used $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'] unfiltered. Trying to > teach people which

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0 release with "broken" input filters

2006-10-23 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: On 23-Oct-06, at 4:48 AM, Stefan Esser wrote: Hi, I just wanted to remind you that PHP 5.2.0 will be released with broken and inconsistent input filtering. Right now _SERVER is only passed through the input filter for apache 1 SAPI. All other SAPIs do not pass _SERVER

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0 release with "broken" input filters

2006-10-23 Thread Pierre
Hello, On 10/23/06, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, On 10/23/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 23-Oct-06, at 4:48 AM, Stefan Esser wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I just wanted to remind you that PHP 5.2.0 will be released with > > broken > > and inconsistent input filter

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0 release with "broken" input filters

2006-10-23 Thread Pierre
Hello, On 10/23/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 23-Oct-06, at 4:48 AM, Stefan Esser wrote: > Hi, > > I just wanted to remind you that PHP 5.2.0 will be released with > broken > and inconsistent input filtering. > > Right now _SERVER is only passed through the input filter fo

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0 release with "broken" input filters

2006-10-23 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
On 23-Oct-06, at 4:48 AM, Stefan Esser wrote: Hi, I just wanted to remind you that PHP 5.2.0 will be released with broken and inconsistent input filtering. Right now _SERVER is only passed through the input filter for apache 1 SAPI. All other SAPIs do not pass _SERVER variables through the

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.0 release with "broken" input filters

2006-10-23 Thread Pierre
Hello Stefan, On 10/23/06, Stefan Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I just wanted to remind you that PHP 5.2.0 will be released with broken and inconsistent input filtering. Right now _SERVER is only passed through the input filter for apache 1 SAPI. All other SAPIs do not pass _SERVER vari

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-03 Thread Andi Gutmans
Mainly around the memory manager at this point but we might also start looking at some executor optimizations. Best for Gopal to send us patches when we get to that point. Not sure what CPU he's testing on but it's important to do so on several for these kind of optimizations. We can do that.

RE: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-03 Thread Dmitry Stogov
hanks. Dmitry. > -Original Message- > From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 11:01 AM > To: Dmitry Stogov > Cc: 'Ilia Alshanetsky'; internals@lists.php.net; Andi Gutmans > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0 > > > Dmit

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-03 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Not sure what this has to do with PHP 5.2.0, but yes, improving the optimizer has been on the todo for a while. Volunteers are welcome. Sounds like an idea for a SoC project, or is it already too late for that? It's on the list. No takers y

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-03 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Dmitry Stogov wrote: I am planning to make several performance related changes those will brake binary compatibility with 5.1. May be we need PHP_5_2 CVS branch to allow critical fixes for 5.1? Do you have more details on this? Just want to avoid duplicate work. Gopal has done some work on fi

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-03 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Not sure what this has to do with PHP 5.2.0, but yes, improving the > optimizer has been on the todo for a while. Volunteers are welcome. Sounds like an idea for a SoC project, or is it already too late for that? -- Sebastian Bergmann http://www.se

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > So, if you have changes you'd like to see in 5.2, reply to this e-mail. I have a small feature request that brought up earlier. Back then, Sara mentioned that she would be interested in implementing this: What I need is a userspace streams filter that acts as a defaul

RE: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Dmitry Stogov
alf Of > Ilia Alshanetsky > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 9:53 PM > To: Ron Korving > Cc: internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0 > > > While adding an optimizer to APC is definitely a good thing, but > ultimately APC is an external tool, we want to make

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Wez Furlong
It should already work out-of-the-box if you pass in the prefix to your sqlite install. --Wez. On 5/2/06, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any reason why sqlite (pdo & ext/) can't be compiled without the bundled sqlite. Requiring the use of the bundled sqlite can cause symbol conflicts w

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Evert Pot
Hi Marcus, Thanks for your quick response. First I need to say I'm not really trying to compare this with the PHP streams wrappers.. the streams wrappers do a lot more than just streaming bytes, they even know about files and directories... Marcus Boerger wrote: XMLReader/XMLWriter have not

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Evert, Wednesday, May 3, 2006, 12:09:17 AM, you wrote: > Hi People, > I'm not sure this is the right place to make a feature request, but here > goes.. > I noticed some upgrades/ideas in the streams system lately.. Is there > any chance at all this can be migrated to an OOP system? > H

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Evert Pot
Hi People, I'm not sure this is the right place to make a feature request, but here goes.. I noticed some upgrades/ideas in the streams system lately.. Is there any chance at all this can be migrated to an OOP system? Here's the kind of think i would really like to see (java does it the sa

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Pierre
On Tue, 2 May 2006 22:21:14 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pierre) wrote: > On Tue, 02 May 2006 10:22:14 -0700 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andi Gutmans) wrote: > > > Any reason why sqlite (pdo & ext/) can't be compiled without the > > bundled sqlite. While testing, I also confirm that ext/sqlite with --with

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
On 2-May-06, at 3:25 PM, Andreas Korthaus wrote: Hi! Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: So, if you have changes you'd like to see in 5.2 (don't go too wild now ;-) ), reply to this e-mail. Some issues not yet in the wiki, which have been discussed on this list some time ago: 1. date extension wit

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Pierre
On Tue, 02 May 2006 10:22:14 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andi Gutmans) wrote: > Any reason why sqlite (pdo & ext/) can't be compiled without the > bundled sqlite. You can build using an extern sqlite. However you need 3.2.7, I just noticed that today. I have nothing against requiring it, but it sho

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Pierre
On Tue, 02 May 2006 21:25:41 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Korthaus) wrote: > But perhaps that's something for 6.0... That's all php 6.0 yes, maybe not http... -- Pierre -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Andreas Korthaus
Hi! Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: So, if you have changes you'd like to see in 5.2 (don't go too wild now ;-) ), reply to this e-mail. Some issues not yet in the wiki, which have been discussed on this list some time ago: 1. date extension with OO interface and classname "Date" (don't forget abo

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
While adding an optimizer to APC is definitely a good thing, but ultimately APC is an external tool, we want to make the language itself to become faster. There are series of things that became a bit slower since 4.4, some have been resolved, others are still pending. These are the things 5

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Ron Korving wrote: Well, I'm in no position to ask anyone for anything, but... here goes anyway ;) APC is a good caching mechanism, but is lacking in optimization features, where for example (to my knowledge anyway) Zend Optimizer is doing a good job. Since it looks like APC is going to be inclu

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Ron Korving
Well, I'm in no position to ask anyone for anything, but... here goes anyway ;) APC is a good caching mechanism, but is lacking in optimization features, where for example (to my knowledge anyway) Zend Optimizer is doing a good job. Since it looks like APC is going to be included in PHP 6 by defau

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Andi Gutmans
Any reason why sqlite (pdo & ext/) can't be compiled without the bundled sqlite. Requiring the use of the bundled sqlite can cause symbol conflicts when another Apache module is linked with the system version? If there's no reason, anyone who volunteers to fix it? Thx. At 03:07 AM 5/2/2006, Lu

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.0

2006-05-02 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
Heh, Lukas preempted by e-mail a bit, but the bottom line is that the next release in the 5.X series is going to be 5.2.0. Being a minor version release we have a greater amount of freedom then the one we normally get for patch level releases and that's exactly what we need for some of the