On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 16:15, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason phar is built shared in win32 snapshots even though
> the default in config.w32 is to build it statically?
Isn't there a internals-win@ list ? :)
-Hannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> and the problem will be gone. The false set the "shared" argument to
>> false (problem is that PHP_XYZ_SHARED is set to NULL now or smtg
>> similar). I will have time after alpha2 to dig into this problem and
>> apply a fix
Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Right, my point is that this:
>>
>> configure --enable-debug-pack
>>
>> builds phar in statically, just as zlib is built statically. Perhaps
>> the --enable-snapshot-build could be fixed to match
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right, my point is that this:
>
> configure --enable-debug-pack
>
> builds phar in statically, just as zlib is built statically. Perhaps
> the --enable-snapshot-build could be fixed to match this behavior?
That's my point
Hi
2008/8/30 Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Can you try to actually what is used to build a release please?
>>
>> cscript /nologo configure.js --enable-snapshot-build --enable-debug-pack
>>
>
> So the snapshot build no longer works with the same criteria as the rest of
> the build system? Great
Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Pierre Joye wrote:
>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi,
Is there a reason phar is built shared in
I wonder if I'm completely stupid or unable to get you actually read
the mails before complaining endlessly and obviously 48hours before
the release because we have nothing else to do than that.
I complain endlessly because I see an apparently endless line of things that
worry me, some of which
hi,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can you try to actually what is used to build a release please?
>>
>> cscript /nologo configure.js --enable-snapshot-build --enable-debug-pack
>
> So the snapshot build no longer works with the same criteria as the rest o
Can you try to actually what is used to build a release please?
cscript /nologo configure.js --enable-snapshot-build --enable-debug-pack
So the snapshot build no longer works with the same criteria as the rest of
the build system? Great.
And I still have no answer to my question. Why should
hi,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there a reason phar is built shared in win32 snapshots even though
>>> the default in config.w
Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a reason phar is built shared in win32 snapshots even though
>> the default in config.w32 is to build it statically?
>>
>
> The default config.w32 (besides being wron
Pierre,
I do know, though,
that it all worked fine before the build system was 'upgraded' and
several
of the other config.w32 files across the core were 'fixed' to accommodate
those changes.
Let forget this attempt to yet again discredit the fantastic work
being done by the windows team and
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is there a reason phar is built shared in win32 snapshots even though
>>> the default in config.w32 is to build it statically?
>>
>> The default config.w32 (besides being wrong) is shared.
>
> ARG_ENABLE("phar", "disable phar
Is there a reason phar is built shared in win32 snapshots even though
the default in config.w32 is to build it statically?
The default config.w32 (besides being wrong) is shared.
ARG_ENABLE("phar", "disable phar support", "yes");
I'm still not in a position to test and uncover what you might
hi,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason phar is built shared in win32 snapshots even though
> the default in config.w32 is to build it statically?
The default config.w32 (besides being wrong) is shared.
Why should it be built static
15 matches
Mail list logo
