Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl sqlite

2011-11-19 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > open a bug (doc bug) and add it to the TODOs, so it won't be forgotten. > > done: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=60336 https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54 -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl sqlite

2011-11-19 Thread Pierre Joye
open a bug (doc bug) and add it to the TODOs, so it won't be forgotten. 2011/11/18 Ferenc Kovacs : > > > 2011/11/17 Johannes Schlüter >> >> Just to make one thing clear: To the best of my knowledge the module >> works with 5.4 and trunk (it's three months since I tested, but I'm not >> aware of a

Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl sqlite

2011-11-18 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
2011/11/17 Johannes Schlüter > Just to make one thing clear: To the best of my knowledge the module > works with 5.4 and trunk (it's three months since I tested, but I'm not > aware of a recent big API break) only defect is that the PDO sqlite2 > driver won't be there and can't be enabled in an e

Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl sqlite

2011-11-17 Thread Johannes Schlüter
Just to make one thing clear: To the best of my knowledge the module works with 5.4 and trunk (it's three months since I tested, but I'm not aware of a recent big API break) only defect is that the PDO sqlite2 driver won't be there and can't be enabled in an easy way. The patch I sent yesterday fix

Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl sqlite

2011-11-17 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > hi, > > 2011/11/16 Philip Olson : > > > We need to make pecl/sqlite work with 5.4, as currently it does not. > > Why? We moved it out because it is not maintained anymore. As I agree > that the concept of "move to pecl" for dead extensions is

Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl sqlite

2011-11-17 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, 2011/11/16 Philip Olson : > We need to make pecl/sqlite work with 5.4, as currently it does not. Why? We moved it out because it is not maintained anymore. As I agree that the concept of "move to pecl" for dead extensions is a bad idea, inciting users to continue to use with 5.4 instead of m

Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl sqlite

2011-11-16 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 06:00 -0800, Philip Olson wrote: > We need to make pecl/sqlite work with 5.4, as currently it does not. I > forget the details (and the related patch) but did work on one with > Johannes many months ago. The last step (which failed) was to get > pdo_sqlite2 to work with the

Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl sqlite

2011-11-16 Thread Philip Olson
On Nov 16, 2011, at 5:34 AM, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 13:35 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Felipe Pena wrote: >> >>> 2011/11/16 Ferenc Kovacs : Hi. We moved the sqlite ext from core to pecl with 5.4, but the http://p

Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl sqlite

2011-11-16 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 13:35 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Felipe Pena wrote: > > > 2011/11/16 Ferenc Kovacs : > > > Hi. > > > > > > We moved the sqlite ext from core to pecl with 5.4, but the > > > http://pecl.php.net/package/sqlite still advertises using ext/sql

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PECL-DEV] Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl sqlite

2011-11-16 Thread Derick Rethans
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Felipe Pena wrote: > > > 2011/11/16 Ferenc Kovacs : > > > Hi. > > > > > > We moved the sqlite ext from core to pecl with 5.4, but the > > > http://pecl.php.net/package/sqlite still advertises using ext/sqlite > > > ins

Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl sqlite

2011-11-16 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Felipe Pena wrote: > 2011/11/16 Ferenc Kovacs : > > Hi. > > > > We moved the sqlite ext from core to pecl with 5.4, but the > > http://pecl.php.net/package/sqlite still advertises using ext/sqlite > > instead. > > Is that intentional? > > The problem is, that for

Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl sqlite

2011-11-16 Thread Felipe Pena
2011/11/16 Ferenc Kovacs : > Hi. > > We moved the sqlite ext from core to pecl with 5.4, but the > http://pecl.php.net/package/sqlite still advertises using ext/sqlite > instead. > Is that intentional? > The problem is, that for 5.3, the prefered way to use the sqlite ext is to > use the one bundle