Steph wrote:
>
> Just a quick note here - if this code gets taken on board,
> ext/standard/config.w32 and win32/php5dllts.dsp will need to be updated
> with the relevant src files too.
>
> - Steph
I took a crack at those Windows build files, but I'm not sure if they're
correct as I still don't h
> >I would think that sticking with the current ini files would
> probably lead
> >to less confusion.
>
> I second that...
Just a quick note here - if this code gets taken on board,
ext/standard/config.w32 and win32/php5dllts.dsp will need to be updated with
the relevant src files too.
- Steph
At 07:10 10/08/2004, Jay Smith wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> While anything would be better then the current solution I wonder is
> perhaps going the INI way is not the best idea due to the potential
> confusion. The fellow who supplies the ini files with browser information
> also has a csv fil
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> While anything would be better then the current solution I wonder is
> perhaps going the INI way is not the best idea due to the potential
> confusion. The fellow who supplies the ini files with browser information
> also has a csv file with the very same data that is muc
While anything would be better then the current solution I wonder is perhaps
going the INI way is not the best idea due to the potential confusion. The
fellow who supplies the ini files with browser information also has a csv
file with the very same data that is much easier to parse.
Ilia
On A
