Hi Ferenc,
I'll update the RFC to match the current implementation.
Pierrick is working to extract a diff more simplified so you can
quickly look at it.
Thanks.
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:02 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:02 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com <
guilhermebla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I promise myself to not revamp this discussion again, but it wasn't me
> this time!
>
> @Etienne: That RFC is outdated.
> Since the last feedback form internals list, a lot of changes have
Hi Karsten,
On 24 March 2011 04:14, Karsten Dambekalns wrote:
> Hi Guilherme.
>
> On 14.03.11 19:02, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
> > @Etienne: That RFC is outdated.
> > Since the last feedback form internals list, a lot of changes have
> > been made to that RFC. Maybe I should update it ASA
Hi Guilherme.
On 14.03.11 19:02, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
> @Etienne: That RFC is outdated.
> Since the last feedback form internals list, a lot of changes have
> been made to that RFC. Maybe I should update it ASAP so you can
> clearly understand what have changed to be compatible with cu
The presented patch is just a quick and dirty work that I could put
together in 2 days, with knowledge of the zend engine. Thanks to some
tips from Pierrick, I'm slowly improving its quality.
However my ideal goals are pretty close to what you have done in your
rfc. Today Pierrick added the possib
Hi all,
I promise myself to not revamp this discussion again, but it wasn't me
this time!
@Etienne: That RFC is outdated.
Since the last feedback form internals list, a lot of changes have
been made to that RFC. Maybe I should update it ASAP so you can
clearly understand what have changed to be c
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Marcelo Gornstein wrote:
>> I don't believe the patch was anywhere near an accepted state back then,
>> sadly.
> Are you saying there wont be annotations in PHP? Is there any way to
> contribute to make this feature accepted and available?
No, only that no compro
On 14/03/11 8:47 AM, Marcelo Gornstein wrote:
it has already been discussed with length. Please take a look at:
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations
Thank you for the link. That is actually pretty much what I intended
to do. The only difference with my own version lies in the possibility
to anno
> I don't believe the patch was anywhere near an accepted state back then,
> sadly.
Are you saying there wont be annotations in PHP? Is there any way to
contribute to make this feature accepted and available?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://ww
On Mar 13 18:47:38, Marcelo Gornstein wrote:
> > it has already been discussed with length. Please take a look at:
> >
> > http://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations
> Thank you for the link. That is actually pretty much what I intended
> to do. The only difference with my own version lies in the possibil
> it has already been discussed with length. Please take a look at:
>
> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations
Thank you for the link. That is actually pretty much what I intended
to do. The only difference with my own version lies in the possibility
to annotate method parameters (very useful in many
On Mar 13 17:50:33, Marcelo Gornstein wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I'm new to this list, so please excuse me if this subject was already
> discussed, or proposed.
Hi,
it has already been discussed with length. Please take a look at:
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations
it would be more productive if
12 matches
Mail list logo
