I support this patch 100%. I have a large application I'm rewriting to
include namespaces, however now I can no longer use my script caching
functionality (which improved performance literally about 500%) that
compiled all of my includes into one file, because many of the files
have namespaces.
On
Does closing php tags end the namespace declaration? ie would the
following work:
php tags would not influence namespace declarations, i.e. it would
continue as if there were just PHP code.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
(408)253-8829
On 9/11/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if the
> file has namespaces, then it can have no code outside namespaces.
This seems like a great compromise, FWIW +1 here.
Does closing php tags end the namespace declaration? ie would the
following work:
namespace foo;
class a
{
pub
On 9/11/07, Larry Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 September 2007, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> > Hello Stanislav,
> >
> > Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 1:21:07 AM, you wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Following the feedback from the community, we (mostly me and Dmitry)
> > > tried to find
On Tuesday 11 September 2007, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Stanislav,
>
> Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 1:21:07 AM, you wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Following the feedback from the community, we (mostly me and Dmitry)
> > tried to find a good model that would allow multiple namespaces per file
> > withou
> And even if we do
> multiple namespaces per file. I guess we do not allow a
> namespace to be spread onto several files, right?
Current implementation allows to spread one namespace on several files.
You should just use "namespace" with the same name on top of each file.
(Very similar to Java)
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
So, for the people that wanted multiple NS per file, would such solution
work?
I think the limitation is acceptable.
P.S. this is *not* a "should we use braces" thread, so please don't :)
The syntax is not, but since you disallow discussing this in this
thread, I
Hello Stanislav,
Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 1:21:07 AM, you wrote:
> Hi!
> Following the feedback from the community, we (mostly me and Dmitry)
> tried to find a good model that would allow multiple namespaces per file
> without running into too many problems and complications, and would
>
is somefile.php also included in the B namespace since you cannot
include it in global scope.
No, somefile.php does not automatically belong to either A or B, it can
contain namespaces definition inside and thus belong to either A or B or
neither, but it is parsed as entirely separate entity
On 9/10/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, I was wondering to myself, do you guys think it would be possible
> > to do something like having an endnamespaces; keyword that would put
> > an end to the namespace definition?
>
> Oh no :) It doesn't look good and it doesn't solve
Ok, I was wondering to myself, do you guys think it would be possible
to do something like having an endnamespaces; keyword that would put
an end to the namespace definition?
Oh no :) It doesn't look good and it doesn't solve the problem. Hint:
the braces have the same problem (that's why I ask
On 9/10/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Following the feedback from the community, we (mostly me and Dmitry)
> tried to find a good model that would allow multiple namespaces per file
> without running into too many problems and complications, and would
> allow to bundle
12 matches
Mail list logo
