I have just updated libs on tha build machine. Def file has been committed
too.
Edin
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 4:26 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] libxml/libxslt on win32
If possible can the libxml and libxs
From: Steph
> well.. would it kill anyone to have iconv built-in anyway? I mean by
> default built-in? At present that's done purely for libxml but Frank's
> right, gtk+ also has it as a dependency. Are these the only two areas
that
> rely on iconv at all?
As far as I could tell yes those are
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:15:09 +0100, Steph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wez could answer me a
> question here: if iconv was built-in, would it now (or will it soon be)
> possible to ensure that it was built prior to libxml or any other extension
> that might rely on it?
Yep, my patch is in HEAD. (5
ml or any other extension
that might rely on it?
And who cares about BSDI anyway? ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank M. Kromann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 July 2004 00:42
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] libxml/libxslt on wi
Message-
> > From: Frank M. Kromann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 19 July 2004 23:32
> > To: Rob Richards
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libxml/libxslt on win32
> >
> >
> > I've been using these libraries for a
n
external iconv.dll at runtime..
- Steph
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank M. Kromann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 July 2004 23:32
> To: Rob Richards
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libxml/libxslt on win32
>
>
> I've been using th
I've been using these libraries for a while without problems.
Can we split the iconv related exports from php_libxml.def to
php_iconv.def. This will make it possible to build with iconv, but without
libxml.
- Frank
> If possible can the libxml and libxslt libs get updated to newer
versions?
> Li
