On 10 September 2024 18:59:11 BST, Rob Landers wrote:
>From the beginning, I have stated that I don't see these two RFCs as competing
>or mutually exclusive.
> ...
> If this RFC succeeds, it will simplify the design of core autoloading,
> allowing us to focus expressly on the API, which I bel
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024, at 15:28, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 September 2024 at 23:44, Rob Landers wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024, at 17:22, Rob Landers wrote:
>>> Hello internals,
>>>
>>> I've decided to attempt an RFC for function autoloading. After reading
>>> hundreds of ancient (an
On Tuesday, 3 September 2024 at 23:44, Rob Landers wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024, at 17:22, Rob Landers wrote:
>
>> Hello internals,
>>
>> I've decided to attempt an RFC for function autoloading. After reading
>> hundreds of ancient (and recent) emails relating to the topic along with
>> severa
On 05.09.2024 22:45, Rob Landers wrote:
I'm not opposed to holding off on merging the implementation if it
makes sense to wait and see how Gina's proposal develops, but I also
don't want to risk withdrawing my RFC and Gina's not passing for
unrelated reasons; I hope that makes sense.
I would
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 10:58 PM Rob Landers wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024, at 21:03, Jakob Givoni wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:18 PM Rob Landers wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, at 17:16, Jakob Givoni wrote:
>
>
>
> 2. I've removed artificial restrictions on the constants in which all
Hi Rob,
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 10:45 PM Rob Landers wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024, at 21:03, Jakob Givoni wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:18 PM Rob Landers wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, at 17:16, Jakob Givoni wrote:
>
>
>
> 2. I've removed artificial restrictions on the constants in
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024, at 21:03, Jakob Givoni wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:18 PM Rob Landers wrote:
>> __
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, at 17:16, Jakob Givoni wrote:
>>>
2. I've removed artificial restrictions on the constants in which all
functions that take them can accept both a
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024, at 21:03, Jakob Givoni wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:18 PM Rob Landers wrote:
>> __
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, at 17:16, Jakob Givoni wrote:
>>>
2. I've removed artificial restrictions on the constants in which all
functions that take them can accept both a
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:18 PM Rob Landers wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, at 17:16, Jakob Givoni wrote:
>
>
>
> 2. I've removed artificial restrictions on the constants in which all
> functions that take them can accept both at the same time and behave
> appropriately.
>
>
> I'm not a big fan pass
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, at 17:16, Jakob Givoni wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:49 PM Rob Landers wrote:
>> 1. I've removed the BC break—the 'type' of the autoloadee will not be passed
>> to the autoloader. This can allow someone to use spl_autoload for function
>> autoloading if they so de
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:49 PM Rob Landers wrote:
> 1. I've removed the BC break—the 'type' of the autoloadee will not be
> passed to the autoloader. This can allow someone to use spl_autoload for
> function autoloading if they so desire.
Unless I'm missing something, the main example in the R
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024, at 17:22, Rob Landers wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> I've decided to attempt an RFC for function autoloading. After reading
> hundreds of ancient (and recent) emails relating to the topic along with
> several abandoned RFCs from the past, and after much review, I've decided
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024, at 20:28, Mel Dafert wrote:
> On August 15, 2024 5:22:51 PM GMT+02:00, Rob Landers
> wrote:
> >Hello internals,
> >
> >I've decided to attempt an RFC for function autoloading. After reading
> >hundreds of ancient (and recent) emails relating to the topic along with
> >seve
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024, at 01:53, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, 4:56 PM Rob Landers wrote:
>> __
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, at 18:07, Rob Landers wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, at 08:50, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
On 20 August 2024 00:21:22
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, 4:56 PM Rob Landers wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, at 18:07, Rob Landers wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, at 08:50, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
>
>
>
> On 20 August 2024 00:21:22 BST, Rob Landers wrote:
> >
> >I assume you are worried about something like this passing
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, at 18:07, Rob Landers wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, at 08:50, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20 August 2024 00:21:22 BST, Rob Landers wrote:
>> >
>> >I assume you are worried about something like this passing test?
>> >
>> >--TEST--
>> >show called only once
>>
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, at 08:50, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
>
>
> On 20 August 2024 00:21:22 BST, Rob Landers wrote:
> >
> >I assume you are worried about something like this passing test?
> >
> >--TEST--
> >show called only once
> >--FILE--
> > >
> >namespace test;
> >
> >spl_autoload_register
On 20 August 2024 00:21:22 BST, Rob Landers wrote:
>
>I assume you are worried about something like this passing test?
>
>--TEST--
>show called only once
>--FILE--
>
>namespace test;
>
>spl_autoload_register(function($name) {
>echo "name=$name\n";
>}, true, false, SPL_AUTOLOAD_FUNCTION);
>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024, at 23:17, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
> On 19/08/2024 17:23, Rob Landers wrote:
>
> > As far as performance for ambiguous functions go, I was thinking of
> > submitting an RFC, where ambiguous function calls are tagged during
> > compilation and always resolve lexically,
On 19/08/2024 17:23, Rob Landers wrote:
As far as performance for ambiguous functions go, I was thinking of
submitting an RFC, where ambiguous function calls are tagged during
compilation and always resolve lexically, sorta like how it works now:
echo strlen($x); // resolves to global, always
On August 15, 2024 5:22:51 PM GMT+02:00, Rob Landers wrote:
>Hello internals,
>
>I've decided to attempt an RFC for function autoloading. After reading
>hundreds of ancient (and recent) emails relating to the topic along with
>several abandoned RFCs from the past, and after much review, I've dec
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024, at 14:03, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 August 2024 at 17:22, Rob Landers wrote:
>> Hello internals,
>>
>> I've decided to attempt an RFC for function autoloading. After reading
>> hundreds of ancient (and recent) emails relating to the topic along with
>> sever
On Thursday, 15 August 2024 at 17:22, Rob Landers wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> I've decided to attempt an RFC for function autoloading. After reading
> hundreds of ancient (and recent) emails relating to the topic along with
> several abandoned RFCs from the past, and after much review, I've d
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024, at 11:36, Stephen Reay wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
>> On 18 Aug 2024, at 04:33, Rob Landers wrote:
>>
>> I wouldn't consider it a BC break, no. But (ironically?), Symfony crashes
>> with this change.
>
>
> I wasn't aware of that specific code before but it's exactly the type o
Hi Rob,
> On 18 Aug 2024, at 04:33, Rob Landers wrote:
>
> I wouldn't consider it a BC break, no. But (ironically?), Symfony crashes
> with this change.
I wasn't aware of that specific code before but it's exactly the type of issue
I was talking about earlier.
> Ah, good catch. I've update
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024, at 00:40, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
>
>
> On 17 August 2024 22:33:03 BST, Rob Landers wrote:
> >I wouldn't consider it a BC break, no. But (ironically?), Symfony crashes
> >with this change. It really shouldn't but ...
>
> I don't think it makes sense to say "it breaks
On 17 August 2024 22:33:03 BST, Rob Landers wrote:
>I wouldn't consider it a BC break, no. But (ironically?), Symfony crashes with
>this change. It really shouldn't but ...
I don't think it makes sense to say "it breaks existing code, but it's not a
compatibility break".
Perhaps what you're
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024, at 02:22, Stephen Reay wrote:
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 16 Aug 2024, at 04:45, Rob Landers wrote:
> >
> > Userland functions don't throw that error, so it shouldn't be an issue.
> > (You can pass as many arguments as you want to a userland function, as long
> > as
Sent from my iPhone
> On 16 Aug 2024, at 04:45, Rob Landers wrote:
>
> Userland functions don't throw that error, so it shouldn't be an issue. (You
> can pass as many arguments as you want to a userland function, as long as
> there are enough of them).
Hi Rob,
I didn't mean the actual inte
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024, at 20:40, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
> On 15/08/2024 16:22, Rob Landers wrote:
>> Hello internals,
>>
>> I've decided to attempt an RFC for function autoloading. After reading
>> hundreds of ancient (and recent) emails relating to the topic along with
>> several abandoned
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024, at 18:18, Stephen Reay wrote:
>
>
>> On 15 Aug 2024, at 22:22, Rob Landers wrote:
>>
>> Hello internals,
>>
>> I've decided to attempt an RFC for function autoloading. After reading
>> hundreds of ancient (and recent) emails relating to the topic along with
>> several a
> Le 15 août 2024 à 17:27, Rob Landers a écrit :
>
>
> Hello internals,
>
> I've decided to attempt an RFC for function autoloading. After reading
> hundreds of ancient (and recent) emails relating to the topic along with
> several abandoned RFCs from the past, and after much review, I've
On 15/08/2024 16:22, Rob Landers wrote:
Hello internals,
I've decided to attempt an RFC for function autoloading. After reading
hundreds of ancient (and recent) emails relating to the topic along
with several abandoned RFCs from the past, and after much review, I've
decided to put forth a var
> On 15 Aug 2024, at 22:22, Rob Landers wrote:
>
> Hello internals,
>
> I've decided to attempt an RFC for function autoloading. After reading
> hundreds of ancient (and recent) emails relating to the topic along with
> several abandoned RFCs from the past, and after much review, I've decide
34 matches
Mail list logo
