done.
Dmitry.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Stas Malyshev
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > array of registered resources of particular type. See patch:
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/dstogov/f96c04f5979e726909ab
>
> It would be better as a pull, it's be easier to comment on it.
> For the function get_r
Hi!
> array of registered resources of particular type. See patch:
>
> https://gist.github.com/dstogov/f96c04f5979e726909ab
It would be better as a pull, it's be easier to comment on it.
For the function get_resources, the proto says it has no arguments, but
it actually has one S argument that i
Hello Dmitry,
On 20.08.2014 12:08, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> To have a robust way to detect resource leaks I propose a new
> function -
> get_resources() that returns an array of all registered resources or
> an
> array of registered resources of particular type. See patch:
>
> https://gist.github.co
The are not defined.
They are open (or closed but not freed yet).
You probably meant get_defined_resorce_types()
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Julien Pauli wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> > Anyone objects about it or thinks it needs RFC?
>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Anyone objects about it or thinks it needs RFC?
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Laruence wrote:
>
>> Hey:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Yesterday we discussed w
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Anyone objects about it or thinks it needs RFC?
No, goahead :)
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Anyone objects about it or thinks it needs RFC?
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Laruence wrote:
> Hey:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yesterday we discussed with Nikta the failure of
> > ext/standard/tests/http/bug60570.phpt. It w
Hey:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday we discussed with Nikta the failure of
> ext/standard/tests/http/bug60570.phpt. It was in context of AST patch, but
> the failure is not related to AST at all. It's just a bad test that makes
> wrong assumption.
>
>
hi,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday we discussed with Nikta the failure of
> ext/standard/tests/http/bug60570.phpt. It was in context of AST patch, but
> the failure is not related to AST at all. It's just a bad test that makes
> wrong assumption.
>
> Res
