> So that next time this code changes any breakage is obvious.
Next time?
I had reported breakage for PHP 5.4.4 RC, but it "wont fix" and PHP
5.4.4 was released.
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=62097
I think the breakage exists in current version (PHP 5.4.4).
> Any test you create for PHP 5.4
On 06/26/2012 09:06 PM, OISHI Kazuo wrote:
Does this need an architecture specific SKIPIF? See the mention of
PHP_INT_SIZE on http://qa.php.net/write-test.php
Like this?
===
--SKIPIF--
==
> Does this need an architecture specific SKIPIF? See the mention of
> PHP_INT_SIZE on http://qa.php.net/write-test.php
Like this?
===
--SKIPIF--
===
I'm afraid I may miss yo
On 06/22/2012 12:08 AM, OISHI Kazuo wrote:
Hi,
In addition to == operator, >, <, >=, and <= operators are influenced.
And, hexdecimal format for big number is now case-sensitive.
http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg58789.html
Can you add some phpt tests for all the cas
Hi,
>> In addition to == operator, >, <, >=, and <= operators are influenced.
>>
>> And, hexdecimal format for big number is now case-sensitive.
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg58789.html
>
> Can you add some phpt tests for all the cases you've raised?
This is the php
On 06/14/2012 10:42 PM, OISHI Kazuo wrote:
I know this was discussed a number of times here, but just to bring it
to a conclusion - I intend to apply patch in the bug report - which
removes conversion for strings that do not convert to integers - to 5.4.
If anybody sees anything that breaks bec
>> I know this was discussed a number of times here, but just to bring it
>> to a conclusion - I intend to apply patch in the bug report - which
>> removes conversion for strings that do not convert to integers - to 5.4.
>> If anybody sees anything that breaks because of this please tell.
>
> "1234
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Hartmut Holzgraefe
wrote:
> Too late to raise this now anyway, but ...
>
> On 13.05.2012 04:39, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>> I know this was discussed a number of times here, but just to bring it
>> to a conclusion - I intend to apply patch in the bug report - which
>>
Too late to raise this now anyway, but ...
On 13.05.2012 04:39, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> I know this was discussed a number of times here, but just to bring it
> to a conclusion - I intend to apply patch in the bug report - which
> removes conversion for strings that do not convert to integers - to
Hi!
> So the float comparison behavior under ~B (what's in the patch) may seem
> more desirable because it preserves the numerical comparison when possible
> (and we don't have to add leading whitespace and zeros to the mix,
> strcmp("9, "11") returns 1). Until you realize it's alternating b
On Sun, 13 May 2012 04:39:33 +0200, Stas Malyshev
wrote:
I know this was discussed a number of times here, but just to bring it
to a conclusion - I intend to apply patch in the bug report - which
removes conversion for strings that do not convert to integers - to 5.4.
If anybody sees anything
11 matches
Mail list logo
