Good point. I think it's somehow undesired behavior, but what can one do to
change this? I guess it somehow is desired behavior...
My bad I guess,
Ron
"Matthew Charles Kavanagh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ron Korving wrote:
>
> >The last item in the array is
Ron Korving wrote:
>The last item in the array is replaced, not by the first one of the second
>foreach, but by the item before the last item. That just doesn't make sense
>at all.
>
>
This is where you're going wrong (and where I was going wrong in
thinking about this before Antony's message).
Okay, you're right that it starts working fine when I rename the $item to
$blah, but your explanation doesn't make much sense.
After the first foreach, $item points to the last one, that I already
figured. If you ask me, the second foreach should replace the instance of
$item, not overwrite it. Bu
On 16.09.2005 16:29, Ron Korving wrote:
My apologies for my DOM-mistake today, but right now I came across something
that totally stunned me. It's a total paradox situation that just has to be
one of the biggest bugs I've ever come across in PHP. Personally, I think
it's rather high-priority beca
