I'm sorry, I guess I wasn't real clear on that - I've always known this
feature as a source directive, guess I didn't know that's not really an
established term.
What I'm referring to is much simpler than what you suggested - it's just
an equivalent to the "source" pre-processor directive in for e
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
> I hear a lot of interesting arguments in this big annotation discussion,
> and now there's the ongoing vision discussion, which got me thinking.
>
> It is true that there is broad community interest in annotations - part of
> the problem he
