Here's a test for that (I don't have php-src karma) if anyone would
care to commit it. Passes on 5.2.6, but fails on 5.3alpha3-dev
FWIW, I committed that patch today.
I'd like for it to pass by RC1 (-:
S
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://ww
Pierre Joye napsal(a):
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/11/10 Jaroslav Hanslík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Pierre Joye napsal(a):
php_pspell.dll
php_snmp.dll
snmp and pspell are likely to do not be present in the next release
and maybe not in the
Please bring up any areas you are concerned about that we might have
forgotten.
PHP_5_3 as of this morning does not contain that patch that makes
ArrayObject behave like an array (reset()).
Here's a test for that (I don't have php-src karma) if anyone would
care to commit it. Passes on 5.
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 18:06, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
pecl4win is dead and will not be restored anymore. In the next weeks,
pecl.php.net will provide the DLLs based on releases instead of random
snapshots, for each active branches (5.2
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Jared Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But where?
>
> pecl4win.php.net hasn't compiled APC since January, and certainly nothing
> for 5.3
pecl4win is dead and will not be restored anymore. In the next weeks,
pecl.php.net will provide the DLLs based on releas
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 18:06, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
>>
>> pecl4win is dead and will not be restored anymore. In the next weeks,
>> pecl.php.net will provide the DLLs based on releases instead of random
>> snapshots, for each active branches (5.2, 5.3 and HEAD
Pierre Joye wrote:
pecl4win is dead and will not be restored anymore. In the next weeks,
pecl.php.net will provide the DLLs based on releases instead of random
snapshots, for each active branches (5.2, 5.3 and HEAD).
Does this mean we will have the same problem with pecl that we currently have
> -Original Message-
> From: Pierre Joye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 November 2008 15:46
> To: Jared Williams
> Cc: Lester Caine; PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] alpha3 or forever hold your peace
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Jared Willi
008 12:32
> To: PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] alpha3 or forever hold your peace
>
> Jared Williams wrote:
> > APC is another missing extension.
>
> apc is in pecl - so would be provided with the PECL binary.
>
> --
> Lester Caine - G8HFL
> ---
On 10.11.2008, at 16:06, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/11/10 Jaroslav Hanslík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Pierre Joye napsal(a):
php_pspell.dll
php_snmp.dll
snmp and pspell are likely to do not be present in the next rele
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/10 Jaroslav Hanslík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Pierre Joye napsal(a):
>>
php_pspell.dll
php_snmp.dll
>>>
>>> snmp and pspell are likely to do not be present in the next release
>>> and maybe not in the
Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> 2008/11/10 Jaroslav Hanslík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Pierre Joye napsal(a):
>>
php_pspell.dll
php_snmp.dll
>>> snmp and pspell are likely to do not be present in the next release
>>> and maybe not in the final release (windows only). The underlying
>>> librari
2008/11/10 Jaroslav Hanslík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Pierre Joye napsal(a):
>
>>> php_pspell.dll
>>> php_snmp.dll
>>
>> snmp and pspell are likely to do not be present in the next release
>> and maybe not in the final release (windows only). The underlying
>> libraries are not portable enough to be u
Pierre Joye napsal(a):
php_pspell.dll
php_snmp.dll
snmp and pspell are likely to do not be present in the next release
and maybe not in the final release (windows only). The underlying
libraries are not portable enough to be used on windows and the
versions used before have critical issues (se
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Current windows alpha does not have
> php_mcrypt.dll
mcrypt is present (builtin)
> php_dba.dll
> php_gmp.dll
They will be in the next release.
> php_pspell.dll
> php_snmp.dll
snmp and pspell are likely to do not be pr
Jared Williams wrote:
APC is another missing extension.
apc is in pecl - so would be provided with the PECL binary.
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http
> -Original Message-
> From: Lester Caine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 November 2008 08:23
> To: PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] alpha3 or forever hold your peace
>
> Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> > I just wanted to ask everybody to skim over th
Lester Caine wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Pierre there are some 44 extensions in the 5.2.x snapshot and only 30
odd in the 5.3.x snapshot - I don't have time to go through every one
to check their status. Is that information available somewhere?
This is why I asked to check the NEWS file:
Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 12:41 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>> 1. Change ext/phar to be disabled by default
>
> Is that the only case? We have a few new extensions, fileinfo is enabled
> by default at the moment, hash is, sqlite3 is, ...
>
> So the question is: What's the p
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 12:41 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> 1. Change ext/phar to be disabled by default
Is that the only case? We have a few new extensions, fileinfo is enabled
by default at the moment, hash is, sqlite3 is, ...
So the question is: What's the purpose of bundling extensions and what
On 10.11.2008, at 12:06, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Jani,
Monday, November 10, 2008, 11:41:44 AM, you wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to ask everybody to skim over the changes for PHP
5.3 we have in CVS (especially bigger stuff like the addition/
r
On 10.11.2008, at 12:27, Jani Taskinen wrote:
4. Output buffering rewrite MFH: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=42641&edit=1
If there is a significant show of hands of people that feel that the
code in HEAD is so much easier to maintain, that suddenly they feel
more inclined than before to
On 10.11.2008, at 12:04, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 10.11.2008, at 11:41, Jani Taskinen wrote:
2. Change ext/ereg to be disabled by default (scheduled to be
removed in PHP 6, iirc?)
IIRC we are not yet in agreement on the removal. AFAIK its already
an extension in
Jani Taskinen wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to ask everybody to skim over the changes for PHP 5.3 we
have in CVS (especially bigger stuff like the addition/removal of an
extension etc.). Please bring up any areas you are concerned about
that we might have forgotten. Howev
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Pierre there are some 44 extensions in the 5.2.x snapshot and only 30
odd in the 5.3.x snapshot - I don't have time to go through every one
to check their status. Is that information available somewhere?
This is why I asked to check the NEWS file:
http://cvs.php.net/vi
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Jani,
Monday, November 10, 2008, 11:41:44 AM, you wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to ask everybody to skim over the changes for PHP 5.3 we
have in CVS (especially bigger stuff like the addition/removal of an
extension etc.). Please bring up any
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 10.11.2008, at 11:41, Jani Taskinen wrote:
2. Change ext/ereg to be disabled by default (scheduled to be removed
in PHP 6, iirc?)
IIRC we are not yet in agreement on the removal. AFAIK its already an
extension in PHP6, but I am not sure if we wanted to contin
Hello Jani,
Monday, November 10, 2008, 11:41:44 AM, you wrote:
> Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just wanted to ask everybody to skim over the changes for PHP 5.3 we
>> have in CVS (especially bigger stuff like the addition/removal of an
>> extension etc.). Please bring up any areas yo
On 10.11.2008, at 11:41, Jani Taskinen wrote:
2. Change ext/ereg to be disabled by default (scheduled to be
removed in PHP 6, iirc?)
IIRC we are not yet in agreement on the removal. AFAIK its already an
extension in PHP6, but I am not sure if we wanted to continue with the
proposal t
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
>>
>> 2) We still need someone to do upgrades to new parameter-parsing api in
>>b) ext/interbase (any volunteers?)
>
> Where will I find some help on actually what needs doing? I presume that the
On 10.11.2008, at 11:42, Lester Caine wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
There is still the problems with windows builds of PHP5.3. I've
not been
able to test anything on new builds since php_interbas
Pierre Joye wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
There is still the problems with windows builds of PHP5.3. I've not been
able to test anything on new builds since php_interbase is not being
compiled. I've not checked what th
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to ask everybody to skim over the changes for PHP 5.3 we
have in CVS (especially bigger stuff like the addition/removal of an
extension etc.). Please bring up any areas you are concerned about that
we might have forgotten. However I am not interested
Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
2) We still need someone to do upgrades to new parameter-parsing api in
b) ext/interbase (any volunteers?)
Where will I find some help on actually what needs doing? I presume that the
Linux build has not been updated although I'm not actually seeing a problem at
p
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> There is still the problems with windows builds of PHP5.3. I've not been
> able to test anything on new builds since php_interbase is not being
> compiled. I've not checked what the other dozen or
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to ask everybody to skim over the changes for PHP 5.3 we have
> in CVS (especially bigger stuff like the addition/removal of an extension
> etc.). Please bring up any areas you are concerned about
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
I just wanted to ask everybody to skim over the changes for PHP 5.3 we
have in CVS (especially bigger stuff like the addition/removal of an
extension etc.). Please bring up any areas you are concerned about that
we might have forgotten. However I am not interested in pe
37 matches
Mail list logo
