As many as make sense. But this thread is dead, if all goes well and the
work Derick has done sorts things out.
Zeev
At 01:18 11/10/2005, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
How many date formatting functions do we need?
-Andrei
Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I've been away from email for the last couple of week
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> How many date formatting functions do we need?
Two, one for non-locale based formatting, and one for locale based
formatting. Unfortunately as we only have a 32 bit integer we also need
some outside of the current date() one, so that makes 4 (if we
How many date formatting functions do we need?
-Andrei
Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I've been away from email for the last couple of weeks - read through the
> timezone thread, and didn't really see a conclusion.
>
> My suggestion is to restore the old code in its entirely, and introduce
> the
> new imp
> I started the build when I got home at 3am ;-) It's now online:
> http://www.php.net/manual/en/timezones.php, I'll check later
> today where I want to link this in exactly.
Nice work on this TZ stuff Derick.
My thanks.
Best,
Mike Robinson
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Lukas Smith wrote:
> Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > You don't need this, as there is:
> > http://no.php.net/date_default_timezone_set
>
> cool ..
>
> now we only need to get the list of possible legal TZ's documented (or linked
> from the docs) .. atleast I do not see it yet (b
Derick Rethans wrote:
You don't need this, as there is:
http://no.php.net/date_default_timezone_set
cool ..
now we only need to get the list of possible legal TZ's documented (or
linked from the docs) .. atleast I do not see it yet (but it might be just
me not seeing it at 5 am after coming
Derick Rethans wrote:
You don't need this, as there is:
http://no.php.net/date_default_timezone_set
cool ..
now we only need to get the list of possible legal TZ's documented (or
linked from the docs) .. atleast I do not see it yet (but it might be
just me not seeing it at 5 am after coming
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Lester Caine wrote:
> Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> > > If the TZ detection works reliable, I don't see any reason to revert or
> > > postpone Dericks work, the timezone handling of his implementation is so
> > > much better than the old one, it's really worth the upgrade for everyo
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Lukas Smith wrote:
> Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> > Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >
> > >Ok, maybe I missed it in the lengthy thread.
> >
> >
> >
> > I suspect that is very much the case. Derick has been working quite
> > diligently over the last little while at getting the BC problem
Zeev Suraski wrote:
If the TZ detection works reliable, I don't see any reason to revert or
postpone Dericks work, the timezone handling of his implementation is so
much better than the old one, it's really worth the upgrade for everyone
having to deal with different timezones.
Ok, maybe I mis
On 8.10.2005 15:30 Uhr, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I've been away from email for the last couple of weeks - read through
the timezone thread, and didn't really see a conclusion.
IIRC the conclusion was, that Derick tries to make the TZ detection
better (which was the only BC problem, AFAIK). And accor
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote:
Ok, maybe I missed it in the lengthy thread.
I suspect that is very much the case. Derick has been working quite
diligently over the last little while at getting the BC problems solved
and as far as I know all but a few Win32 issues have been reso
Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Ok, maybe I missed it in the lengthy thread.
I suspect that is very much the case. Derick has been working quite
diligently over the last little while at getting the BC problems solved
and as far as I know all but a few Win32 issues have been resolved to
everyones satisfacti
Christian Stocker wrote:
> IIRC the conclusion was, that Derick tries to make the TZ
> detection better (which was the only BC problem, AFAIK). And
> according to him, that's now almost solved (except some weird
> problems on Windows).
>
> He even made a pecl package for updating the TZ data ea
At 15:44 08/10/2005, Christian Stocker wrote:
On 8.10.2005 15:30 Uhr, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I've been away from email for the last couple of weeks - read through
> the timezone thread, and didn't really see a conclusion.
IIRC the conclusion was, that Derick tries to make the TZ detection
bette
On 8.10.2005 15:30 Uhr, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I've been away from email for the last couple of weeks - read through
> the timezone thread, and didn't really see a conclusion.
IIRC the conclusion was, that Derick tries to make the TZ detection
better (which was the only BC problem, AFAIK). And ac
At 15:33 08/10/2005, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I've been away from email for the last couple of weeks - read through the
> timezone thread, and didn't really see a conclusion.
>
> My suggestion is to restore the old code in its entirely, and introduce the
>
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I've been away from email for the last couple of weeks - read through the
> timezone thread, and didn't really see a conclusion.
>
> My suggestion is to restore the old code in its entirely, and introduce the
> new implementation as new functions with a p
18 matches
Mail list logo
