Re: [PHP-DEV] Test

2016-06-10 Thread Lester Caine
On 10/06/16 09:47, Sherif Ramadan wrote: > Just testing that the mailing list is still working. Please ignore. Looks like it started working sometime yesterday. My test message seems to be lost in the ether ;) The fact there was a network failure on Virgin since last night means I'm only just getti

Re: [PHP-DEV] test sapi/fpm/tests/015.phpt

2014-12-02 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
2014.12.02. 20:57 ezt írta ("Maciej Sobaczewski" ): >> >> interesting, I've checked out https://travis-ci.org/php/php-src/builds >> before sending my mail, and looked into a couple of failed builds, but >> couldn't find anything with this particular test. >> > > As far as I can see, Remi already ma

Re: [PHP-DEV] test sapi/fpm/tests/015.phpt

2014-12-02 Thread Maciej Sobaczewski
interesting, I've checked out https://travis-ci.org/php/php-src/builds before sending my mail, and looked into a couple of failed builds, but couldn't find anything with this particular test. As far as I can see, Remi already marked it as XFAIL. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Maili

Re: [PHP-DEV] test sapi/fpm/tests/015.phpt

2014-12-02 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > > where do you see this test failing? > > on travis, or somewhere else? > > Yes, on Travis. Fails almost every other time. > > -- > Stas Malyshev > smalys...@gmail.com > interesting, I've checked out https://travis-ci.org/php/ph

Re: [PHP-DEV] test sapi/fpm/tests/015.phpt

2014-12-02 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Hi! > where do you see this test failing? > on travis, or somewhere else? Yes, on Travis. Fails almost every other time. -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] test sapi/fpm/tests/015.phpt

2014-12-02 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Hi Remi! > > I see that the test sapi/fpm/tests/015.phpt is randomly intermittently > failing all the time in CI, making it harder to evaluate fixes. The > cause of the failure is additional one or two messages like this: > > ERROR: unab

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test suite results on bigendian - Fixed

2014-12-02 Thread Remi Collet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 With latest commit (Thanks dmitry) test suite in ppc64 is now OK. Remi. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlR9vY8ACgkQYUppBSnxahixCwCfbnQmf9/z6W17icpOErgJTOb

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test suite results on bigendian

2014-12-02 Thread Remi Collet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 02/12/2014 08:58, Remi Collet a écrit : > Mostly for Dmitry > > After some work, I can reduce the failed tests number from 111 to 5 > :) (configure --disable-all) > > Those seems related to new mm. => munmap() failed: [22] Invalid > argument $ gd

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test Post

2013-09-11 Thread Madara Uchiha
It works. On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Andrey Andreev wrote: > If you're reading this - it works. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test Post

2013-09-11 Thread Andrey Andreev
If you're reading this - it works.

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test failures

2011-08-20 Thread Johannes Schlüter
Hi, On Aug 20, 2011, at 11:17, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > On 8/20/11 1:25 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: >> btw, can we go with 5.3.8 instead? I really don't like the pl thing :) > > Well, that's for the 5.3 RM to decide :) I think it's in the README.RELEASE_PROCESS that we don't do pl anymore bu

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test failures

2011-08-20 Thread Stas Malyshev
Hi! On 8/20/11 1:25 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: btw, can we go with 5.3.8 instead? I really don't like the pl thing :) Well, that's for the 5.3 RM to decide :) -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Develop

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test failures (was: 5.3.7pl1)

2011-08-20 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, Right, I sadly did not run them as I use to between the last RC and final but only the apps tests (wp&co), which do not use crypt's md5. I also agree about the amount of failing tests and warnings, for the same reasons. However checking the delta between two releases should help too (that's wh

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test failures (was: 5.3.7pl1)

2011-08-19 Thread Stas Malyshev
Hi! On 8/19/11 5:02 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: The secondary problem is that we are not doing a good job running our tests prior to releases. I think this is mostly because we have way too many tests that fail and one more or less failing test gets lost in the noise. Yes, this is a problem: her

Re: [PHP-DEV] test, pls ignore

2011-06-05 Thread Matt Wilson
+1 On Jun 5, 2011, at 6:02 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > test for brain dead SURBL > > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- PHP Inte

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test Patches - Again

2011-05-16 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On 05/16/2011 01:39 PM, Jeraimee Hughes wrote: This time, the correct patches and a new gist url: https://gist.github.com/975322 Again, no karma to commit them. Sorry about the bad gist. What makes you think you have no karma? You should have access to commit to */tests and phpdoc. Could you

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test OpenGrok installation (LXR replacement?)

2009-12-28 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Michael Maclean wrote: > Philip Olson wrote: >> >> Looks great, and much nicer. If you feel pb11[1] could handle it, then we >> could dedicate this box to OpenGrok (as grok.php.net?). > > it'd be worth a shot, I think. Though could we get the OS on there upgr

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test OpenGrok installation (LXR replacement?)

2009-12-28 Thread Michael Maclean
Philip Olson wrote: Looks great, and much nicer. If you feel pb11[1] could handle it, then we could dedicate this box to OpenGrok (as grok.php.net?). it'd be worth a shot, I think. Though could we get the OS on there upgraded to something a little newer? I'm not sure if Java 1.6 will run on

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test OpenGrok installation (LXR replacement?)

2009-12-28 Thread Michael Maclean
Pierre Joye wrote: First suggestion, would it be possible to have *.c/h first in the results instead of the phpt? I'm not sure, but I'll have a look. Michael -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test OpenGrok installation (LXR replacement?)

2009-12-27 Thread Philip Olson
On Dec 27, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Michael Maclean wrote: > Hi, > Since LXR hasn't been updating since the shift to SVN, I've been > investigating bringing it back. Today, though, I came across OpenGrok which > appears to be a far more modern implementation of the same thing, using > Lucene as the b

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test OpenGrok installation (LXR replacement?)

2009-12-27 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Michael Maclean wrote: > Hi, > Since LXR hasn't been updating since the shift to SVN, I've been > investigating bringing it back. Today, though, I came across OpenGrok which > appears to be a far more modern implementation of the same thing, using > Lucene as

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test for edge cases with __get and property access flags

2009-06-05 Thread John Mertic
Here's that test. I don't have commit rights to that area of CVS so someone will need to do it for me. John Mertic jmer...@php.net On 6/5/09 5:58 AM, Stan Vassilev wrote: 3. When the caller tries to retrieve $object->foo, and foo is a private/protected member the caller has no access to,

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test for edge cases with __get and property access flags

2009-06-05 Thread Eddie Drapkin
I thought this was the expected behaviour as well and I am quite sure that I've used it in an experiment (all class members private and _get() output escapes them) that failed pretty miserably. But I did think this was the expected behavior. Perhaps it ought to throw an E_STRICT? On Fri, Jun 5,

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test for edge cases with __get and property access flags

2009-06-05 Thread Stan Vassilev
3. When the caller tries to retrieve $object->foo, and foo is a private/protected member the caller has no access to, instead of an error, __get is called. I'm not very sure the current behavior on item 3 is the best one (maybe error should be thrown regardless?), but freezing on eith

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test for edge cases with __get and property access flags

2009-06-04 Thread Alexey Zakhlestin
2009/6/4 Stan Vassilev > > 3. When the caller tries to retrieve $object->foo, and foo is a > private/protected member the caller has no access to, instead of an error, > __get is called. > > I'm not very sure the current behavior on item 3 is the best one (maybe > error should be thrown regardles

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test case for bug #43495

2007-12-08 Thread Christian Hoffmann
On 12/08/2007 09:18 PM, Antony Dovgal wrote: > On 08.12.2007 23:12, Christian Hoffmann wrote: >> Heya, >> >> I wondered why bug #43495 [1] (array_merge_recursive crash with >> recursive arrays) was fixed without committing a test case > > http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/php-src/ext/standard/tests/ar

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test case for bug #43495

2007-12-08 Thread Antony Dovgal
On 08.12.2007 23:12, Christian Hoffmann wrote: > Heya, > > I wondered why bug #43495 [1] (array_merge_recursive crash with > recursive arrays) was fixed without committing a test case http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/php-src/ext/standard/tests/array/bug43495.phpt ?? -- the bug > reporter even supp

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test mail.

2004-02-07 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote: > On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Ananth Kesari wrote: > > > Sorry for the inconvenience. Just testing since my mails with > > attachments to this group are bouncing back! > > You need to send text attachments that end in .txt. The requirement is to send

Re: [PHP-DEV] Test mail.

2004-02-03 Thread Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Ananth Kesari wrote: > Sorry for the inconvenience. Just testing since my mails with > attachments to this group are bouncing back! You need to send text attachments that end in .txt. -adam -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] author of o'reilly's php cookbook avoid the holiday rush, buy y