Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It indeed does look very hackish. Is this bug the same bug as the last
> patch of yours addressed?
Not the same, but those are similar in the point that both are basically
because of the current engine's limitation in handling temporary variables.
(If
It indeed does look very hackish. Is this bug the same bug as the last
patch of yours addressed?
I'll try and take a look at the bug report this week. I'm not quite sure
this can/should be fixed. AFAIK the return value of $str[1] = '*' is the
updated string itself and not the assigned '*'.
Andi
