Hi,
I don't think this inclusion is a problem, but I also don't see any real
benefits.
Some parts of the syntax should be verbose to make it easier to read and
understand, especially for those who are just arriving.
Soon, people will want to be writing `pub` instead of `public`, or `priv`
instea
Hi,
I don't hate the idea, I actually really like the rust-ish look of it, though
personally I would prefer to have short function syntax for closures before
methods (I.e. fn () { ... } is a syntax I wanted and could not use countless
times in all the years since the introduction of arrow functi
> I know that the `fn` Syntax is already used for arrow functions, but what
i
> am suggesting is that, can't we make `fn` to be used in naming methods in
> class? (this will be optional though),
Hello Oladoyinbo,
Personally for me, if I see `fn` in methods instead of `function` I would
expect
it
I honestly don't see any benefits. `function` isn't verbose, it's
explicit. I prefer `function` over `fn` for methods.
But despite what one may prefer, I believe changing the language
syntax just because of "taste" probably isn't worth the effort.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Maili
