Am 29.11.2023 um 08:12 schrieb Derick Rethans:
Not really, as a hash doesn't directly tell me the date/time, and neither would
it help in dev branches / checkouts where the latest changes haven't been
comiited yet.
I do not see how date/time help with seeing what was compiled.
--
PHP Interna
On 29 November 2023 00:48:28 GMT, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 28, 2023, 5:28 PM Derick Rethans wrote:
>
>> On 28 November 2023 17:28:18 GMT, Sebastian Bergmann
>> wrote:
>>
>> >While we could probably replace __DATE__ and __TIME__ with
>> SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH [3] [4], I cannot help
Am 28.11.2023 um 19:40 schrieb Ilija Tovilo:
At least for core, enabled-by-default extensions, __DATE__ and
__TIME__ seem to be the only variables. I can get reproducible builds
by setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH.
Confirmed: I can get reproducible builds, too, by using CLANG and setting
SOURCE_DATE_
Am 29.11.2023 um 07:23 schrieb Sebastian Bergmann:
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=$(git log -1 --pretty=%cI) should do the trick.
What I meant to write was SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=$(git log -1 --pretty=%ct), of
course. Sorry for the noise.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe,
Am 29.11.2023 um 01:54 schrieb Marco Pivetta:
Also, refs have a timestamp :-)
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=$(git log -1 --pretty=%cI) should do the trick.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 01:48, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <
mweierophin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023, 5:28 PM Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > On 28 November 2023 17:28:18 GMT, Sebastian Bergmann
> > wrote:
> >
> > >While we could probably replace __DATE__ and __TIME__ with
> > SOURCE_DATE
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023, 5:28 PM Derick Rethans wrote:
> On 28 November 2023 17:28:18 GMT, Sebastian Bergmann
> wrote:
>
> >While we could probably replace __DATE__ and __TIME__ with
> SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH [3] [4], I cannot help but wonder whether having the date
> and time when the executable was bui
On 28 November 2023 17:28:18 GMT, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>While we could probably replace __DATE__ and __TIME__ with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
>[3] [4], I cannot help but wonder whether having the date and time when the
>executable was built in the executable is actually useful. How attached are we
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 19:40, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> That said, I wouldn't object to removing the date either.
>
Wishful thinking, but perhaps a GIT ref of some sort would be a good
replacement too, if the working copy is clean.
I wouldn't put too much weight on it, but that would certainly help
Hi Sebastian
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 6:28 PM Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>
> I recently watched a video [1] that once again brought the topic of
> reproducible builds [2] to my attention.
> ...
> I have not yet checked whether usage of the __DATE__ and __TIME__ macros
> is the only thing that makes
10 matches
Mail list logo
