Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-17 Thread Derick Rethans
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Lorenzo Alberton wrote: > Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > Yes, we know there are still some issues here. People are working on > > it. Or there is at least intent to work on it. See > > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33643 > > actually this is the bug Robert was referring to: >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-17 Thread Lorenzo Alberton
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Yes, we know there are still some issues here. People are working on it. Or there is at least intent to work on it. See http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33643 actually this is the bug Robert was referring to: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33558 Regards, -- Lorenzo Albe

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 20:47, Wez Furlong wrote: > If you think its so easy, why haven't we seen a patch to fix it coming from > you? Because I don't have time *pthththth*. > Now, stop wasting our time with your continued ranting (that applies > to *everyone* who keeps going on-and-on-and-on-and-

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-17 Thread Wez Furlong
If you think its so easy, why haven't we seen a patch to fix it coming from you? Now, stop wasting our time with your continued ranting (that applies to *everyone* who keeps going on-and-on-and-on-and-on about this) and let us get on with something more productive, which might even include making

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 19:52, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Yes, we know there are still some issues here. People are working on > it. Or there is at least intent to work on it. See > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33643 Ahhh, very cool. Thanks. Cheers, Rob. > Robert Cummings wrote: > > I think the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-17 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Yes, we know there are still some issues here. People are working on it. Or there is at least intent to work on it. See http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33643 -Rasmus Robert Cummings wrote: > I think the reference notice stuff is a bit ridiculous. I mean I can > understand the concern behind: >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 19:25, Matthew Charles Kavanagh wrote: > Enjoy your presumptions, I'm sure they're great fun at parties. Yes, one of my favourites is that jaws are made of glass. Cheers, Rob. -- .. | InterJinn Application Framewor

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-17 Thread Matthew Charles Kavanagh
Enjoy your presumptions, I'm sure they're great fun at parties. Robert Cummings wrote: > Also, >quite probably unlike you, many of us programmer try to make our code >perfectly clean from notices and warnings > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: h

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 18:06, Matthew Charles Kavanagh wrote: > It's a notice. Your soul won't curdle and fall out of your ears just > because your code produces a notice which you can easily prevent from > being output. My soul didn't curdle and fall out of my ears before the notice was added eith

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 19:07, Matthew Charles Kavanagh wrote: > Either way, I really don't think it's worth any fuss. It's just a > notice, and whether it is there or not shouldn't really matter that > much. This doesn't deserve all the attention it's been getting on this list. That's your opinion

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-17 Thread Matthew Charles Kavanagh
Either way, I really don't think it's worth any fuss. It's just a notice, and whether it is there or not shouldn't really matter that much. This doesn't deserve all the attention it's been getting on this list. Robert Cummings wrote: >My soul didn't curdle and fall out of my ears before the notic

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reference Notice

2005-07-17 Thread Matthew Charles Kavanagh
It's a notice. Your soul won't curdle and fall out of your ears just because your code produces a notice which you can easily prevent from being output. Robert Cummings wrote: >I think the reference notice stuff is a bit ridiculous. I mean I can >understand the concern behind: > >function &fo