On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Hannes
Magnusson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 13:16, Arnold Daniels wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This was not mend as an ad or as spam. I was suggesting the use of a
>> distributed system instead of a central VCS. I probably shouldn't have
>> mentioned GIT specifically.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 13:16, Arnold Daniels wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This was not mend as an ad or as spam. I was suggesting the use of a
> distributed system instead of a central VCS. I probably shouldn't have
> mentioned GIT specifically. Using Arch, Bazaar, Monotone or any other
> distributed VCS will
Hi,
This was not mend as an ad or as spam. I was suggesting the use of a
distributed system instead of a central VCS. I probably shouldn't have
mentioned GIT specifically. Using Arch, Bazaar, Monotone or any other
distributed VCS will give the same advantages.
A good article that talks about the
On Jul 20, 2009, at 6:40 AM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Can I suggest you not to suggest any other VCS from now on?
If you like some VCS better, just keep that info to yourself, no
need to spam the mailing lists about it.
More to the point, there was a considerable amount of controversey
over whe
Can I suggest you not to suggest any other VCS from now on?
If you like some VCS better, just keep that info to yourself, no need to
spam the mailing lists about it.
--Jani
On 07/20/2009 01:38 PM, Arnold Daniels wrote:
Hi,
Can I suggest having a look at GIT (http://git-scm.com). It has some
