> > It already "blew up" existing applications before this commit.
>
> I'd say that all extensions should really follow the 1 prefix per ext
> for anything that ends up in the global namespace (classes, functions.
> constants ..) rule. Just as we did in the past with new procudural
> extension
Hello Jared,
Tuesday, April 5, 2005, 1:58:04 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> I'd say that all extensions should really follow the 1 prefix
>> per ext for anything that ends up in the global namespace
>> (classes, functions.
>> constants ..) rule. Just as we did in the past with new
>> procudural extens
>
> I'd say that all extensions should really follow the 1 prefix
> per ext for anything that ends up in the global namespace
> (classes, functions.
> constants ..) rule. Just as we did in the past with new
> procudural extensions.
>
> This has the advantage of:
> - limiting the number of nam
