Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available

2013-02-14 Thread Pierre Joye
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Pierre Joye in php.internals (Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:58:21 +0100): >>> Or am I looking with my nose? >> >>Yes ;-) > > Snow for my eyes, frost on my nose. My zips do contain > php_ZendOptimizerPlus.dll and a lot of other extensions. That's all ni

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available

2013-02-14 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
Pierre Joye in php.internals (Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:58:21 +0100): >> Or am I looking with my nose? > >Yes ;-) Snow for my eyes, frost on my nose. My zips do contain php_ZendOptimizerPlus.dll and a lot of other extensions. Jan -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe,

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available

2013-02-14 Thread Pierre Joye
hi Jan, On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Pierre Joye in php.internals (Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:47:48 +0100): >>VC9 snaps are already available for all almost all commits at >>http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/ > > http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/php-5.4/r4b900f4/ do

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available

2013-02-14 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
Pierre Joye in php.internals (Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:47:48 +0100): >VC9 snaps are already available for all almost all commits at >http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/ http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/php-5.4/r4b900f4/ do not include php_ZendOptimizerPlus.dll yet. >http://windows.php.net/qa

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available

2013-02-14 Thread Pierre Joye
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Pierre Joye in php.internals (Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:21:33 +0100): >>VC11 builds of PHP 5.5 (php itself :) snapshots are coming shortly too. > > I will stick with VC9 for the moment ;-) > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8954372/php-5.5.0alpha4-Win32-VC9-

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available

2013-02-14 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
Pierre Joye in php.internals (Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:21:33 +0100): >VC11 builds of PHP 5.5 (php itself :) snapshots are coming shortly too. I will stick with VC9 for the moment ;-) http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8954372/php-5.5.0alpha4-Win32-VC9-x86.zip http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8954372/php-5.5.0alpha4-nts-Wi

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available

2013-02-14 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
Pierre Joye in php.internals (Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:44:30 +0100): >I misread the question, it is expected, like php_xdebug, php_apc, etc. Loaded from the command line (PHP 5.5.0alpha4 TS): This program makes use of the Zend Scripting Language Engine: Zend Engine v2.5.0-dev, Copyright (c) 1998-2013

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available

2013-02-14 Thread Pierre Joye
hi Jan, On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: >>> I also tried to compile it as a normal extension (in PHP 5.4 and PHP >>> 5.5). The standard Windows (VC9) build script tries to make >>> php_ZendOptimizerPlus.dll in stead of ZendOptimizerPlus.dll. Are there >>> any tweaks needed

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available

2013-02-14 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
Pierre Joye in php.internals (Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:09:57 +0100): >Yes, this bug is fixed in master, I submitter the PR earlier today. OK. It builds now. >> I also tried to compile it as a normal extension (in PHP 5.4 and PHP >> 5.5). The standard Windows (VC9) build script tries to make >> php_Zen

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available

2013-02-14 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Pierre Joye in php.internals (Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:21:33 +0100): >>On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: >>> Is my impression right that there is still a lot to be done to get this >>> compiled under Windows? I did not su

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available

2013-02-14 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
Pierre Joye in php.internals (Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:21:33 +0100): >On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: >> Is my impression right that there is still a lot to be done to get this >> compiled under Windows? I did not succeed and then looked into >> config.m4. There are huge differenc