On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> > It was a plan in the past, I think we should just do it - now.
>
> If you mean moving the directory from pecl to ext/ - that's fine as
> long as maintainers commit to keeping it in shape (last time, I
> remember, 5.4 support was lagging). If you mean
Hi!
> It was a plan in the past, I think we should just do it - now.
If you mean moving the directory from pecl to ext/ - that's fine as long
as maintainers commit to keeping it in shape (last time, I remember, 5.4
support was lagging). If you mean more tight integration - see my
previous email w
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
>
> > Rasmus wrote:
> >
> > > This is my worry as well. Especially when it comes to opcode cache
> > > support. Most of the patches I see these days completely ignore the
> > > opcode cache side of
