On 2/4/06, Jessie Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Pardon me for my ignorance, as I have not even looked at the Unicode
> stuff, but based on what you wrote, what about always allocating two
> UChars per codepoint? It would take a bit more space, but then
> random-offset indexi
First of all I was simply proposing a very generic concept without
bothering about the implementation on purpose. If it's not feasible then
simply ignore it.
Marcus Boerger wrote:
caching? There is nothing to cache. And even if we would do that we would
make every string an object since we w
Hello Christian,
caching? There is nothing to cache. And even if we would do that we would
make every string an object since we would need to invalidate the position
cache on write operations. Also i agree with the others that most common
usage would be accessing a few chars probably changing th
