On 12/07/07, Gaetano Giunta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I finally have something demoable, regarding the possibility of
extending pecl4win to offer compiled dlls of the released version pf
pecl packages, besides the compiled cvs version.
The build process is almost ok:
+ two separate buil
I think I finally have something demoable, regarding the possibility of
extending pecl4win to offer compiled dlls of the released version pf
pecl packages, besides the compiled cvs version.
The build process is almost ok:
+ two separate build environments (incl. pecl trees) are used: one for
p
Sorry. Not complaining, just looking for clarification.
On 18/06/07, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We all know it's problematic already. Everyone's looking for solutions
rather than complaints here :)
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "internal
We all know it's problematic already. Everyone's looking for solutions
rather than complaints here :)
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "internals"
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:53 AM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: SNAPS+SNAPSPecl different to Pecl4Win
