On 24 March 2025 09:20:03 GMT, "Alexandru Pătrănescu"
wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 5:20 PM Larry Garfield
>wrote:
>
>>
>> So, how would nested classes compare to fileprivate, in terms of ability
>> to solve the problem space? As I understand it, the goal is:
>>
>> 1. Classes that can be i
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 5:20 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
>
> So, how would nested classes compare to fileprivate, in terms of ability
> to solve the problem space? As I understand it, the goal is:
>
> 1. Classes that can be instantiated only by the class that uses them.
> 2. But can be returned fro
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025, at 5:10 AM, Rob Landers wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> I've made some major updates to the text of the RFC to clarify
> behaviors and revisited the implementation (which is still under
> development, though I hope to have a draft by the end of this weekend).
> Here's a broa
Hi
Am 2025-03-14 01:22, schrieb Bob Weinand:
[…] class constants in uppercase […]
enum cases are a notable Exception. They also use PascalCase (both
internal enums and the PER-CS coding style as published by PHP-FIG).
But that's also a good question for the RFC author: Is defining inner
cl
Hi
Am 2025-03-13 21:46, schrieb Rob Landers:
I will give \\ a try, but it has to be typed quite a bit when
referencing inner classes, so keeping it easy to type is a must. I feel
like \\ requires a large movement to type, at least on a qwerty
non-english keyboard. Maybe people using other keyb
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025, at 11:10, Rob Landers wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2025, at 00:11, Rob Landers wrote:
>> Hello PHP Internals,
>>
>> I'd like to introduce my RFC for discussion:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short-and-inner-classes
>>
>> This RFC defines a short class syntax as well as the ability
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025, at 23:26, Bob Weinand wrote:
> Hey Rob,
>
> On 13.3.2025 21:46:49, Rob Landers wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025, at 12:01, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 2025-03-12 11:10, schrieb Rob Landers:
>>> > - Accessing inner classes is done via a new token: ":>" instead of
Hey Rob,
On 14.3.2025 00:26:03, Rob Landers wrote:
My biggest issue with `::` is that it gets weird:
class Foo {
public class Bar {}
public const Bar = "";
public static function Bar() {}
}
echo Foo::Bar; // this is the constant
new Foo::Bar(); // this is the class
Foo::Bar(); // this is
Hey Rob,
On 13.3.2025 21:46:49, Rob Landers wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025, at 12:01, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi
Am 2025-03-12 11:10, schrieb Rob Landers:
> - Accessing inner classes is done via a new token: ":>" instead of
> "::".
I don't particularly like that. It is “invented syntax” and I don't
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025, at 21:41, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi Rob
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 1:57 PM Rob Landers wrote:
> >
> > > the proposal is
> > > currently quite complex.
> >
> > Most of this is just describing how classes work already and going in-depth
> > on where there may be confusion --
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025, at 12:01, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 2025-03-12 11:10, schrieb Rob Landers:
> > - Accessing inner classes is done via a new token: ":>" instead of
> > "::".
>
> I don't particularly like that. It is “invented syntax” and I don't
> think that inner classes are suffi
Hi Rob
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 1:57 PM Rob Landers wrote:
>
> > the proposal is
> > currently quite complex.
>
> Most of this is just describing how classes work already and going in-depth
> on where there may be confusion -- there are no significant changes to how
> classes actually work. The
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025, at 12:41, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi Rob
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:01 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> >
> > Am 2025-03-12 11:10, schrieb Rob Landers:
> > > - Accessing inner classes is done via a new token: ":>" instead of
> > > "::".
> >
> > I don't particularly like that. It
Hi Rob
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:01 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>
> Am 2025-03-12 11:10, schrieb Rob Landers:
> > - Accessing inner classes is done via a new token: ":>" instead of
> > "::".
>
> I don't particularly like that. It is “invented syntax” and I don't
> think that inner classes are suffic
Hi
Am 2025-03-12 11:10, schrieb Rob Landers:
- Accessing inner classes is done via a new token: ":>" instead of
"::".
I don't particularly like that. It is “invented syntax” and I don't
think that inner classes are sufficiently valuable to dedicate an entire
operator to them that could serve
15 matches
Mail list logo
