At 03:02 18/02/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote:
the point is not being able to treat them differently. The point is being
able to distinguish them so the right operation is called.
Erm sorry, but it's exactly the same :)
Zeev
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscri
Hello Zeev and hello Sara
Saturday, February 18, 2006, 1:04:20 AM, you wrote:
> At 01:24 18/02/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>>Actually Sara only asked whether she could add a flag to some handlers.
>>That has nothing to with anything you started to discuss from there.
> Uhm, Sara asked whether sh
At 01:24 18/02/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Actually Sara only asked whether she could add a flag to some handlers.
That has nothing to with anything you started to discuss from there.
Uhm, Sara asked whether she could add a flag to a specific operator
to facilitate a certain behavior, namely,
Hello Zeev,
Friday, February 17, 2006, 12:09:26 PM, you wrote:
> At 11:55 17/02/2006, Stefan Walk wrote:
>>On 16/02/06, Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > In languages where operator overloading is supported, it comes hand
>> > in hand with strict typing, which wouldn't allow for differ
Interesting stuff! Exactly the kind of stuff that's worrying me.
I think you found a conceptual bug in zend_hash_compare(), I think
it's worth fixing.
Zeev
At 14:59 17/02/2006, Jakub Vrana wrote:
Sara Golemon wrote:
> Yes, and that's the problem. $a > $b *isn't* read by the
current parse
Jakub Vrana wrote:
Sara Golemon wrote:
with thanks to Sara! - because (not for the first time) your post
allowed me to learn/understand some new stuff. (Sara seems to
have a knack for explaining stuff in a way that dummies can [also]
understand it - that a good thing[tm]!)
Yes, and that's t
At 11:55 17/02/2006, Stefan Walk wrote:
On 16/02/06, Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In languages where operator overloading is supported, it comes hand
> in hand with strict typing, which wouldn't allow for different values
> for x>y and y
> Zeev
That's not true, Ruby for example has
On 16/02/06, Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In languages where operator overloading is supported, it comes hand
> in hand with strict typing, which wouldn't allow for different values
> for x>y and y
> Zeev
That's not true, Ruby for example has operator overloading, and has no
problems
