Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 22:10 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> At the moment dba is the best place to add support for tokyo cabinets
>> without introducing major features (or a pecl extension).
>
> "without introducing major features" doesn't sound like a good way for
> a
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 22:10 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> At the moment dba is the best place to add support for tokyo cabinets
> without introducing major features (or a pecl extension).
"without introducing major features" doesn't sound like a good way for
architecture decisions. This s
Michael Maclean wrote:
> Antony Dovgal wrote:
>>> Here I'm talking about adding support for tokyo cabinets as a dba
>>> handler, not a complete interface to the multiple tokyo cabinet APIs.
>>
>> Are you sure you want to add it to ext/dba?
>> dba is .. well.. dead, and it sound like a complete wa
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Here I'm talking about adding support for tokyo cabinets as a dba handler,
> not a complete interface to the multiple tokyo cabinet APIs.
>
This is already in old-trunk:
http://svn.php.net/repository/php/php-src/branches/FIRST_UNICODE_IMP
Antony Dovgal wrote:
Here I'm talking about adding support for tokyo cabinets as a dba handler,
not a complete interface to the multiple tokyo cabinet APIs.
Are you sure you want to add it to ext/dba?
dba is .. well.. dead, and it sound like a complete waste of time.
There is an item on the w
On 03/18/2010 09:44 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> I would actually be happy if I could build support for dba handlers as
> separate extensions, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Correct me if I'm
> wrong.
>
> Here I'm talking about adding support for tokyo cabinets as a dba handler,
> not a
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Am 18.03.2010 19:10, schrieb Raphael Geissert:
>> I was considering adding support for tokyo cabinets, would that still
>> be acceptable for 5.3.x?
>
> I think something like that should go into a PECL extension.
I would actually be happy if I could build support for
Am 18.03.2010 19:10, schrieb Raphael Geissert:
> I was considering adding support for tokyo cabinets, would that still
> be acceptable for 5.3.x?
I think something like that should go into a PECL extension.
--
Sebastian BergmannCo-Founder and Principal Consultant
http://seba
