Hi,
Joe Watkins wrote:
Afternoon Andrea,
A case can be made that the binary cast might at some point do
something: "(binary) $ustring"
There is no case whatever for the literal b prefix, it will *never*
have a function if we are not changing the default string representation.
I
Afternoon Andrea,
A case can be made that the binary cast might at some point do
something: "(binary) $ustring"
There is no case whatever for the literal b prefix, it will *never*
have a function if we are not changing the default string representation.
If we do adopt a literal prefi
Hi,
Joe Watkins wrote:
Morning Andrea,
Who is widely deploying something that does absolutely nothing ?
PHAR uses (binary), or so Pedro's email says.
The only reason to keep it would be that we are going to change the
default representation, as pointed out we're not.
If we were
Morning Andrea,
Who is widely deploying something that does absolutely nothing ?
The only reason to keep it would be that we are going to change the
default representation, as pointed out we're not.
This cannot have been left in for considered reasons, it was just
forgotten about.
C