> > A default __toString() doesn't hinder an extension that interoperates with
> > Java/COM or whatever external objects in anyway to handle their casting as
> > they like. In fact the interface approach would deliver the ability to hide
> > those internal differences so that the user can use the
> >> It's just one of my trivial ideas, that why don't us make it capable of
> >> arbitrary casting operation rather than limiting it just for string casts?
Hmm, funny English.. I've got no idea why I wrote it this way.
> > i agree here. this can be important for external integration e.g. Java an
Hello l0t3k,
Thursday, September 4, 2003, 2:56:16 PM, you wrote:
>> It's just one of my trivial ideas, that why don't us make it capable of
>> arbitrary casting operation rather than limiting it just for string casts?
> i agree here. this can be important for external integration e.g. Java and
>
