Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Static class

2024-08-11 Thread Bilge
On 11/08/2024 17:56, Lanre wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 9:23 AM Nick Lockheart wrote: Seriously, Don't give up. readonly properties were declined in 2014. It's now part of PHP. There's many other examples like that. Sometimes you just need to beat the dead horse until it

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Static class

2024-08-11 Thread Lanre
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 9:23 AM Nick Lockheart wrote: > On Sat, 2024-08-10 at 23:37 +0100, Bilge wrote: > > On 10/08/2024 23:32, Nick Lockheart wrote: > > > > Voting has now concluded for static class. The first vote cast > > > > was > > > > for, and of the first four votes cast, three were for a

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Static class

2024-08-11 Thread Nick Lockheart
On Sat, 2024-08-10 at 23:37 +0100, Bilge wrote: > On 10/08/2024 23:32, Nick Lockheart wrote: > > > Voting has now concluded for static class. The first vote cast > > > was > > > for, and of the first four votes cast, three were for and one was > > > against. As the votes continued to roll in, howev

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Static class

2024-08-10 Thread Bilge
On 10/08/2024 23:32, Nick Lockheart wrote: Voting has now concluded for static class. The first vote cast was for, and of the first four votes cast, three were for and one was against. As the votes continued to roll in, however, it was clear which direction the wind was blowing. The final tally r

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Static class

2024-08-10 Thread Nick Lockheart
> Voting has now concluded for static class. The first vote cast was > for, and of the first four votes cast, three were for and one was > against. As the votes continued to roll in, however, it was clear > which direction the wind was blowing. The final tally reached the the > 2/3 critical mass