On 5 March 2012 17:45, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Bostjan Skufca wrote:
>
> > This has to be stressed time and again, in order to start changing
> current
> > perception that upgrading to newer PHP release is a major PITA.
>
> I suppose you mean "not anymore" :)
>
> Th
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Bostjan Skufca wrote:
> This has to be stressed time and again, in order to start changing current
> perception that upgrading to newer PHP release is a major PITA.
I suppose you mean "not anymore" :)
Then go out there to spread the new message and facts! :)
-
On 5 March 2012 17:20, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi Matthew,
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
> wrote:
>
> > Considering that 5.3 adoption is still eclipsed by 5.2 adoption, to be
> > honest, it feels like doing 1 year bugfix + 1 year security fix is the
> > minimum necessa
hi Matthew,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
wrote:
> Considering that 5.3 adoption is still eclipsed by 5.2 adoption, to be
> honest, it feels like doing 1 year bugfix + 1 year security fix is the
> minimum necessary. By the time we get good adoption of 5.3, it will
> alr
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 10:27 -0500, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> On 2012-03-02, Pierre Joye wrote:
> > It should have been done before 5.4.0 was out, but better late than never.
> >
> > I put together four options here:
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php53eol
> >
> > I'm in favor of option #1
