On Mon, Sep 16, 2019, at 10:16 AM, Michał Brzuchalski wrote:
> Hi Rowan,
>
> pon., 16 wrz 2019 o 16:57 Rowan Tommins
> napisał(a):
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> That would require multiple new features, though, so initializers might
> >>> be
> >>> more achievable in the short term, and perhaps ther
Hi Rowan,
pon., 16 wrz 2019 o 16:57 Rowan Tommins
napisał(a):
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> That would require multiple new features, though, so initializers might
>>> be
>>> more achievable in the short term, and perhaps there is room for both,
>>> particularly if support for getters and setters improves.
>>>
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 15:37, Michał Brzuchalski
wrote:
>
>
>> The problem with that is that you need an extra static method to make use
>> of it, and you still need to get the arguments into that method. It might
>> be useful occasionally, but it still doesn't help constructors which are
>> sett
Hi Rowan,
pon., 16 wrz 2019 o 15:47 Rowan Tommins
napisał(a):
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 08:29, Michał Brzuchalski <
> michal.brzuchal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Please keep in mind that initializing properties through object
> initializer
> > applies to visible properties and is possible to assig
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 08:29, Michał Brzuchalski <
michal.brzuchal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please keep in mind that initializing properties through object initializer
> applies to visible properties and is possible to assign
> protected or private properties from the class scope as well.
>
The pr
