On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 08:03 Volker Dusch wrote:
> Version 1.1 Update: Array syntax over named arguments.
>
> Thank you everyone for the discussion and for improving this RFC.
> I'm very happy with the updates we made thanks to your feedback on and off
> list.
>
> The main idea of this RFC wa
Hi
Clarifying on the technical questions.
Am 2025-05-26 16:37, schrieb Nicolas Grekas:
I think the RFC is missing a few bits to be complete:
- making "clone" a function means suddenly a "use clone;" or a "\clone"
is
going to be needed to not get a perf hit, isn't it? But since $y =
clone
$x
Hi Volker,
Thanks for the update.
Le lun. 26 mai 2025 à 16:05, Volker Dusch a
écrit :
> Version 1.1 Update: Array syntax over named arguments.
>
> Thank you everyone for the discussion and for improving this RFC. I'm very
> happy with the updates we made thanks to your feedback on and off list.
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 23:27 Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2025, at 9:13 AM, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>> Am 2025-05-19 12:48, schrieb Volker Dusch:
>>> We're still looking for feedback on the ...variadic approach to the
>>> Syntax:
>>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/clone_with_v2#open_issues, as w
On Wed, May 21, 2025, at 9:13 AM, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 2025-05-19 12:48, schrieb Volker Dusch:
>> We're still looking for feedback on the ...variadic approach to the
>> Syntax:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/clone_with_v2#open_issues, as we only got one
>> reply so far on the topic.
>
> I
Hi
Am 2025-05-21 17:27, schrieb Theodore Brown:
Combining named-parameter `array()` syntax with clone taking a array
as
the second parameter would allow for the following, which might
combine
the best of both worlds?
clone($obj, array(foo: 1, bar: "baz", object: "this is not
blocked"));
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 09:13 Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Am 2025-05-19 12:48, schrieb Volker Dusch:
>> We're still looking for feedback on the ...variadic approach to the
>> Syntax:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/clone_with_v2#open_issues, as we only got one
>> reply so far on the topic.
>
> ...
>
> *So
Hi
Am 2025-05-21 16:27, schrieb Nicolas Grekas:
Thanks for sharing your insights. This looks a bit far reaching for the
RFC.
Making `array()` a function / allowing named parameter syntax with
`array()` would be a separate RFC.
On my side, my opinion is: don't make clone a function call. I'
Hi
Am 2025-05-19 12:48, schrieb Volker Dusch:
We're still looking for feedback on the ...variadic approach to the
Syntax:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/clone_with_v2#open_issues, as we only got one
reply so far on the topic.
I was hoping for some additional opinions here before adding my own, but
Hi Tim,
Le mer. 21 mai 2025 à 16:15, Tim Düsterhus a écrit :
> Hi
>
> Am 2025-05-19 12:48, schrieb Volker Dusch:
> > We're still looking for feedback on the ...variadic approach to the
> > Syntax:
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/clone_with_v2#open_issues, as we only got one
> > reply so far on the
Hi
Am 2025-05-19 15:30, schrieb Larry Garfield:
For positional parameters, I don't see any way that they'd work or do
what someone expects. So why not just block them entirely instead of
relying on dynamic properties to warn-but-sorta-work?
For better or worse PHP supports numeric properties
On Mon, May 19, 2025, at 5:48 AM, Volker Dusch wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Thank you for the participation so far, since the start of the
> discussion, from feedback on and off list, I've added a couple of
> examples:
>
> -
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/clone_with_v2#:~:text=dynamic%20property%20cre
12 matches
Mail list logo
