Hi Niklas,
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 07:48, Niklas Keller wrote:
>
> What's more important here IMO is the restriction of inheritance,
> mainly because the raw arguments are exposed via reflection and won't
> be compatible between parent and child attribute in any case.
>
Could you explain a bit
Hey Benjamin,
thanks for your answers!
> <> would best require a namespace (PHP\Attributes) as I feel
> claminig "Attribute" class in the main namespace might cause problems for
> users.
While this is true, I don't see how Attribute is different to any
classes introduced in the "recent" versions
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 11:30 PM Niklas Keller wrote:
> Hey Benjamin,
>
> I haven't really followed the discussion, so sorry if anything I'm
> writing has already been discussed.
>
> Attributes / annotations are one of the two things I currently miss
> most in PHP (the other being generics), so t
Hey Benjamin,
I haven't really followed the discussion, so sorry if anything I'm
writing has already been discussed.
Attributes / annotations are one of the two things I currently miss
most in PHP (the other being generics), so thanks for the work on
that!
There are a few points that seem odd to
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 6:11 PM Theodore Brown wrote:
>
> the RFC says that the alternate T_ATTRIBUTE `@:` token has the
> downside "that it does not permit whitespace in attribute names to
> allow detecting the ending of the declaration." Can you provide an
> example of an attribute name containi
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 12:43 PM Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 6:11 PM Theodore Brown wrote:
>
> > Can you provide an example of an attribute name containing whitespace
> > that would be allowed with the shift left/right tokens but not with the
> > attribute token?
>
> This
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 6:11 PM Theodore Brown
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 5:49 AM Benjamin Eberlei
> wrote:
>
> > As there has only been minimal new discussion after the last changes to
> the
> > RFC I wanted to give a heads up that I will open the vote on Monday
> > afternoon.
> >
> > If
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 17:11, Theodore Brown wrote:
> Consider this example using the shift left/right token syntax:
>
> ```php
> <> 1, 4 << 1)>><> 1, 4 << 1)>>
> function foo() {}
> ```
>
> To me the same thing using the T_ATTRIBUTE syntax is far more readable:
>
> ```php
> @:BitShiftExample(4 >
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 5:49 AM Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> As there has only been minimal new discussion after the last changes to the
> RFC I wanted to give a heads up that I will open the vote on Monday
> afternoon.
>
> If you have further remarks or questions about the RFC, please let me know.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 4:41 PM Nicolas Grekas
wrote:
> Le jeu. 16 avr. 2020 à 16:29, Larry Garfield a
> écrit :
>
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020, at 1:46 AM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
>>
>> > > > > 3. I see the most common case for attributes being getting the
>> object
>> > > > > version. With the ref
Le jeu. 16 avr. 2020 à 16:29, Larry Garfield a
écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020, at 1:46 AM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
>
> > > > > 3. I see the most common case for attributes being getting the
> object
> > > > > version. With the reflection API as currently described, I see two
> > > > > shortcomin
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020, at 1:46 AM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> > > > 3. I see the most common case for attributes being getting the object
> > > > version. With the reflection API as currently described, I see two
> > > > shortcomings.
> > > >
> > > > A) I can't tell if an attribute has a valid obje
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 6:14 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, at 10:42 AM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:24 PM Larry Garfield
> > wrote:
>
> > > 2. Regarding sub-annotations, can you still do classes as parameters
> even
> > > if not as an annotation marke
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, at 10:42 AM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:24 PM Larry Garfield
> wrote:
> > 2. Regarding sub-annotations, can you still do classes as parameters even
> > if not as an annotation marker? Eg:
> >
> > <>
> > function foo()
> >
> > Or is that also a no-go
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:24 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, at 6:00 AM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have updated the RFC with much of the feedback received here, on
> Twitter
> > and Reddit.
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attributes_v2
> >
> > The follow
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, at 6:00 AM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have updated the RFC with much of the feedback received here, on Twitter
> and Reddit.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attributes_v2
>
> The following changes were made:
>
>- Changed to support the same attribute mu
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:04 PM Nicolas Grekas
wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> I have updated the RFC with much of the feedback received here, on Twitter
>> and Reddit.
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attributes_v2
>
>
> Thanks for the update and for giving this a try!
>
> I'm wondering about nested ann
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:56 PM Iván Arias wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have updated the RFC with much of the feedback received here, on
> Twitter
> and Reddit.
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attributes_v2
>
>
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> Thanks a lot for you effort, same for Martin. I really hope
Hi Benjamin,
I have updated the RFC with much of the feedback received here, on Twitter
> and Reddit.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attributes_v2
Thanks for the update and for giving this a try!
I'm wondering about nested annotations: as you know, they're quite common
in apps that use doctrine/a
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have updated the RFC with much of the feedback received here, on Twitter
and Reddit.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attributes_v2
Hi Benjamin,
Thanks a lot for you effort, same for Martin. I really hope to see this in PHP8.
I have a simple question. From the RFC:
> Attribut
pon., 9 mar 2020 o 15:45 Benjamin Eberlei napisał(a):
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:42 PM Benjamin Eberlei
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I want to resurrect Dmitrys Attributes RFC that was rejected for 7.1 in
> > 2016 with a few changes, incorporating feedback from the mailing list
> back
> > then
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 8:30 PM David Rodrigues
wrote:
> As I am not a good expert on parser (not to say that I don't do anything),
> could you tell me if I can write a note like that?
>
> <<[space]Annotation()[space]>>
> << MyAnnotation(1, 2, 3) >>
>
> It's just because I think the code is more "
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 8:19 PM Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> > I want to resurrect Dmitrys Attributes RFC that was rejected for 7.1 in
> > 2016 with a few changes, incorporating feedback from the mailing list
> back
> > then and from talking to previous no voters.
> >
> > The R
As I am not a good expert on parser (not to say that I don't do anything),
could you tell me if I can write a note like that?
<<[space]Annotation()[space]>>
<< MyAnnotation(1, 2, 3) >>
It's just because I think the code is more "breathable". Until the PSR
staff decides how best to write.
Atenci
24 matches
Mail list logo
