On Oct 31, 2014 11:48 PM, "Miloslav Hůla" wrote:
> I agree with Levi, that using FQN in annotations works. And I wrote
reasons why it is wrong. Moreover, IDEs works with aliases in annotations
well. The only missing fragment is, that you cannot access aliases
definitions in run-time. That's the r
Dne 31.10.2014 12:00, Chris Wright napsal(a):
I agree with Levi, this doesn't make a lot of sense. The only thing that
would make sense in terms of supporting aliases for me would be this:
getName()); // string(31) "Library\Http\Clients\CurlClient"
Alias support is not needed here, HttpClient:
On 31 October 2014 10:27, Miloslav Hůla wrote:
> Dne 30.10.2014 14:50, Levi Morrison napsal(a):
>
>> I also don't think this feature is needed. In comments, simply use
>> fully qualified names.
>>
>
> FQN can be used in docblocks, that's true. But if you write some library
> which uses annotation
Dne 30.10.2014 14:50, Levi Morrison napsal(a):
I also don't think this feature is needed. In comments, simply use
fully qualified names.
FQN can be used in docblocks, that's true. But if you write some library
which uses annotations and you want to offer a kind of comfort to your
users, your
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Miloslav Hůla wrote:
> Dne 13.10.2014 14:55, Miloslav Hůla napsal(a):
>>
>> I've written an RFC which proposes to expose a namespace aliases/imports
>> for user-land code.
>
>
> Good morning internals,
>
> it has been two weeks since I announced this RFC in this li
