Hi Bishop,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Bishop Bettini wrote:
>> To decide next move, I would like to start hearing the reason why from
>> those who are against this RFC.
>
>
> I abstained from voting. While I would be a "Yes" in principle, two specific
> statements in the RFC made me wary of
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> > Vote for "Enable session.use_strict_mode by default" RFC has started.
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/session-use-strict-mode
> >
> > Vote ends 2017/07/19 UTC.
> >
>
> Th
Hi Stas,
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:24 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>> The vote will end in 2 hours and 2 more in favor is required to pass at
>> least.
>>
>> I don't know the reason why some of us against this RFC, but vote is
>> the vote. My guess is you prefer more precise timestamp based se
Hi!
> The vote will end in 2 hours and 2 more in favor is required to pass at
> least.
>
> I don't know the reason why some of us against this RFC, but vote is
> the vote. My guess is you prefer more precise timestamp based session
> managed which has declined.
The number of votes (7) suggests
