Hello Stanislav,
Thursday, November 27, 2003, 3:32:25 PM, you wrote:
MB>>> It respects the refcoutning while destructing the zvals.
> I don't exacetly understand _how_ it respects them so that this solves the
> circular dependency problem. In fact, in the patch in the URL you have
> sent I don'
MB>> It respects the refcoutning while destructing the zvals.
I don't exacetly understand _how_ it respects them so that this solves the
circular dependency problem. In fact, in the patch in the URL you have
sent I don't even see one call to destructor. Also, does you patch take
into account th
Hello Stanislav,
Thursday, November 27, 2003, 1:28:36 PM, you wrote:
MB>>> Ok, sure we care in request shutdown but at least page delivery isn't
MB>>> affected by the patch.
> Definitely it is. The fact that it's _next_ page delivery that would be
> affected is not helping much - any page but
MB>> Ok, sure we care in request shutdown but at least page delivery isn't
MB>> affected by the patch.
Definitely it is. The fact that it's _next_ page delivery that would be
affected is not helping much - any page but the very first since server
run is the next for some page and it is reasonab
Hello Stanislav,
Thursday, November 27, 2003, 1:00:20 PM, you wrote:
MB>>> with 1 < c < 1.1. Since we never cared about shutdown time this
MB>>> should be ok
> If we are talking about request shutdown, we definitely do care about it.
> Slower is the request shutdown, more time the httpd process
MB>> with 1 < c < 1.1. Since we never cared about shutdown time this
MB>> should be ok
If we are talking about request shutdown, we definitely do care about it.
Slower is the request shutdown, more time the httpd process/thread takes
per request, more load on the server.
--
Stanislav Malyshev,
