Wez Furlong wrote:
One of the major aims of PDO is to eventually replace the existing
database extensions in PHP, not to provide total abstraction (which is
a impossible goal in the opinions of many seasoned developers).
Have not found a problem building cross database packages. As long as
you avo
Lukas Smith wrote:
We are lobbying Oracle to add limit support, but thats another topic.
If that happens I want royalties!
-Rasmus
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Lester Caine wrote:
Not into Oracle ;) , but it answers the main questions. PDO is not
planned to be a replacement for ADOdb.
No. That is something for another layer. PDO is intended to be a
very light layer with minimal interference.
Until all engines can use the same SQL there is little poin
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:16:07 +, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not into Oracle ;) , but it answers the main questions. PDO is not
> planned to be a replacement for ADOdb.
Correct.
> > No. That is something for another layer. PDO is intended to be a
> > very light layer with mini
Wez Furlong wrote:
Please read the various links that I posted in the announcement; they
explain a number of design goals about PDO (particularly the OTN
article) that will answer your questions in more detail.
Not into Oracle ;) , but it answers the main questions. PDO is not
planned to be a repl
Please read the various links that I posted in the announcement; they
explain a number of design goals about PDO (particularly the OTN
article) that will answer your questions in more detail.
Here are some quick answers:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:28:38 +, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: