Omar Kilani wrote:
All,
On 1/22/06, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Yep, I think you're right.
It's always easier when it's not in the core because then it's clear that
you're just linking. So I think if as long as we make sure not to touch t
All,
On 1/22/06, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2006, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>
> > Yep, I think you're right.
> > It's always easier when it's not in the core because then it's clear that
> > you're just linking. So I think if as long as we make sure not to touch the
> > l
Yep, I think you're right.
It's always easier when it's not in the core because then it's clear
that you're just linking. So I think if as long as we make sure not
to touch the library unless Omer rolls a new independent version we
should be fine.
At 02:29 AM 1/21/2006, Wez Furlong wrote:
It
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Yep, I think you're right.
> It's always easier when it's not in the core because then it's clear that
> you're just linking. So I think if as long as we make sure not to touch the
> library unless Omer rolls a new independent version we should be fine.
It should be OK provided that the forked library is still functional
when built outside of PHP; the PHP bundled version must be identical
to the version that doesn't require PHP, otherwise the PHP extension
becomes a derivative work and subject to the viral part of the
license.
I think we're good
