On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Dan Kalowsky wrote:
>
> > On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 02:53 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >
> > > ? WTF has this to do with each other. Because PHP is not Linux-only,
> > > that doesn't mean we can not provide RPMs too.
> >
> > D
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Dan Kalowsky wrote:
> On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 02:53 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > ? WTF has this to do with each other. Because PHP is not Linux-only,
> > that doesn't mean we can not provide RPMs too.
>
> Derick, I think the point of this is to not focus solely on R
On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 02:53 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Ken Tossell wrote:
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
when has PHP (and/or PEAR) become Linux-only software?
It never did. That's another point against RPM.
? WTF has this to do with each other. Because PHP is not Linux-on
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Ken Tossell wrote:
> Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >
> >when has PHP (and/or PEAR) become Linux-only software?
> >
> It never did. That's another point against RPM.
? WTF has this to do with each other. Because PHP is not Linux-only,
that doesn't mean we can not provide RPMs
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-06-18 19:39:22 -0400:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
Why not using RPMs? Only windows is a problem, isn't it ?
Windows is the primary platform we need binaries for.
