On 12/01/10 12:21, Lester Caine wrote:
> Dave Ingram wrote:
git archive cranks out a single file representing any commit in the
repository, it can even format the archive w/ zip for the windows
folks ;)
>>> YES but without any header updates to the files.
>>> Once unzipped you have
Dave Ingram wrote:
git archive cranks out a single file representing any commit in the
repository, it can even format the archive w/ zip for the windows
folks ;)
YES but without any header updates to the files.
Once unzipped you have no idea what version a file is, and that IS
causing problems i
On 01/12/10 10:13, Lester Caine wrote:
> See other post as well
>
> Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>
>> git archive cranks out a single file representing any commit in the
>> repository, it can even format the archive w/ zip for the windows
>> folks ;)
> YES but without any header updates to the files.
> Onc
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Lester Caine mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk>> wrote:
While a little off topic, I feel that it is worth our having a
discussion on project management. Source control, and the like ...
I agree.
Current discussion on 'git' highlights the
See other post as well
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
git archive cranks out a single file representing any commit in the
repository, it can even format the archive w/ zip for the windows folks ;)
YES but without any header updates to the files.
Once unzipped you have no idea what version a file is, and
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> While a little off topic, I feel that it is worth our having a discussion
> on project management. Source control, and the like ...
>
> Current discussion on 'git' highlights the fact that there is no clear
> solution to source control. The sw
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> While a little off topic, I feel that it is worth our having a discussion
> on project management. Source control, and the like ...
>
I agree.
>
> Current discussion on 'git' highlights the fact that there is no clear
> solution to source c