It's a love-hate relationship with CVS :)
At the end of the day, it works and with the investment we have in CVS
scripts there are not enough problems to give us enough motivation to move
to anything else.
Andi
P.S.- Clearcase would change my mind :)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Developmen
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Pasha Zubkov wrote:
Andrey Hristov wrote:
Because CVS works and ppl are so far happy with it
Andrey
CVS don't always work properly. This example shows it ;) Also SVN has
It works fine as long as you don't try to outsmart it.
better versioning control mechanism. H
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Pasha Zubkov wrote:
> CVS don't always work properly. This example shows it ;) Also SVN has
> better versioning control mechanism. Hope sometime in the future php
> will "update" to SVN, so why not now?
SVN has other annoyances. We will not move anytime soon. (period)
Derick
Andrey Hristov wrote:
> Because CVS works and ppl are so far happy with it
>
> Andrey
>
CVS don't always work properly. This example shows it ;) Also SVN has
better versioning control mechanism. Hope sometime in the future php
will "update" to SVN, so why not now?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtim
Pasha Zubkov wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
It's a CVS problem - it doesn't resolve repository links with upd, only
on checkout.
Derick
Maybe sputid question, but why PHP stil use CVS instead of SVN?
Because CVS works and ppl are so far happy with it
Andrey
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtim
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Pasha Zubkov wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
It's a CVS problem - it doesn't resolve repository links with upd, only
on checkout.
Maybe sputid question, but why PHP stil use CVS instead of SVN?
How do you want to convert 1100 users instantly withou
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Pasha Zubkov wrote:
> Derick Rethans wrote:
> > It's a CVS problem - it doesn't resolve repository links with upd, only
> > on checkout.
>
> Maybe sputid question, but why PHP stil use CVS instead of SVN?
How do you want to convert 1100 users instantly without causing
disru
Derick Rethans wrote:
> It's a CVS problem - it doesn't resolve repository links with upd, only
> on checkout.
>
> Derick
>
Maybe sputid question, but why PHP stil use CVS instead of SVN?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.p
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Pasha Zubkov wrote:
> Antony Dovgal wrote:
> > Re-read Jani's reply.
> > Do not touch anything, ./buildconf does it for you automagically.
> >
>
> If I modified source, maybe delete some directories ;), and after this I
> want to update source to repo status. "why it's not re
Antony Dovgal wrote:
> Re-read Jani's reply.
> Do not touch anything, ./buildconf does it for you automagically.
>
If I modified source, maybe delete some directories ;), and after this I
want to update source to repo status. "why it's not recovered by `... ud
-d`?"
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runti
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:24:07 +0300
Pasha Zubkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jani Taskinen wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Pasha Zubkov wrote:
> >
> >> Hi list,
> >>
> >> If after `... checkout php-src` I go to directory php-src and remove
> >> ZendEngine2 directory, then run `... up -APd` don't r
Jani Taskinen wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Pasha Zubkov wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> If after `... checkout php-src` I go to directory php-src and remove
>> ZendEngine2 directory, then run `... up -APd` don't restore this
>> directory from repo. How I can update my copy to repo status?
>
>
>
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Pasha Zubkov wrote:
Hi list,
If after `... checkout php-src` I go to directory php-src and remove
ZendEngine2 directory, then run `... up -APd` don't restore this
directory from repo. How I can update my copy to repo status?
Do NOT remove the directory. buildconf hand
13 matches
Mail list logo
