At 06:22 20.03.2003, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
Le lun 17/03/2003 à 20:14, Mike Robinson a écrit :
> FWIW, I'v been doing some light testing here, and writing
> some ab stuff to put some load on it, but at first blush
> apache 2.0.44 and 4.3.2RC1 seems terribly sluggish,
> particularly with the gd s
Le lun 17/03/2003 à 20:14, Mike Robinson a écrit :
> FWIW, I'v been doing some light testing here, and writing
> some ab stuff to put some load on it, but at first blush
> apache 2.0.44 and 4.3.2RC1 seems terribly sluggish,
> particularly with the gd stuff. This could very well be
> my fault.
>
>
Jean-Michel Dault wrote
> Le ven 14/03/2003 à 21:14, Jani Taskinen a écrit :
>> Someone requested that we leave the apache2filter there
>> for now..for some reason he didn't explain and I really
>> didn't care. :)
>It was me, and I did explain that apache2handler had
> serious bugs i
Le ven 14/03/2003 à 21:14, Jani Taskinen a écrit :
> Someone requested that we leave the apache2filter there
> for now..for some reason he didn't explain and I really
> didn't care. :)
It was me, and I did explain that apache2handler had serious bugs in the
previous versions. My reason
Jani Taskinen wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Mike Robinson wrote:
> >Did it in fact make it in, and included in the 4.3.2RC1 release?
>
> Yes. It "replaced" sapi/apache2filter:
>
> --with-apxs2 enables now apache2handler.
>
> Someone requested that we leave the apache2filt
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Mike Robinson wrote:
>I'm curious as to what the status is of the fixed apache2handler
>stuff that was discussed regarding whether or not to include it
>in the 4.3 tree. I was under the impression that despite some
>reluctance to include it (because it was new), it was decided
