[PHP-DEV] RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List)

2007-09-12 Thread P
> From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I've attached my PHAR variation that was made some time ago > just to prove the concept. It uses standard TAR format and > doesn't use any external libraries. > > In case if you call "php test.tar.gz", PHP (with this > extension) will execut

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List)

2007-09-11 Thread Alexey Zakhlestin
On 9/11/07, BuildSmart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It might seem trivial to others because you're not reading the source > > correctly. SPL is not disabled when phar is enabled. > > doesn't the following mean it's disabled or am I interpreting it wrong? > PHP_ADD_EXTENSION_DEP(phar, spl, false

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List)

2007-09-11 Thread BuildSmart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 11, 2007, at 09:58:16, Gregory Beaver wrote: BuildSmart wrote: On Sep 11, 2007, at 05:42:50, Marcus Boerger wrote: Hello Andi, to end this 'many tools' reasoning. For those issues we already adopted zip and if people insist I woul

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List)

2007-09-11 Thread Gregory Beaver
BuildSmart wrote: > > On Sep 11, 2007, at 05:42:50, Marcus Boerger wrote: > > > Hello Andi, > > > to end this 'many tools' reasoning. For those issues we already > adopted > > zip and if people insist I wouldn't mind if anybody would provide a > working > > tar implementation that allows reading

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List)

2007-09-11 Thread BuildSmart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 11, 2007, at 05:42:50, Marcus Boerger wrote: Hello Andi, to end this 'many tools' reasoning. For those issues we already adopted zip and if people insist I wouldn't mind if anybody would provide a working tar implementation that allow

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List)

2007-09-11 Thread Dmitry Stogov
rs Mailing List > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: > [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List) > > > Hello Andi, > > to end this 'many tools' reasoning. For those issues we > already adopted zip and if people insist I wouldn

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List)

2007-09-11 Thread Marcus Boerger
> the core for this. > Andi >> -Original Message- >> From: Gregory Beaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 10:09 PM >> To: Andi Gutmans >> Cc: David Coallier; PHP Developers Mailing List >> Subject: Why not jar for phar?

[PHP-DEV] RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List)

2007-09-10 Thread Andi Gutmans
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 4:05 PM > >> To: Andi Gutmans > >> Cc: Gregory Beaver; PHP Developers Mailing List > >> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List > >> > >> Andi, if there was to be a cross platform tool to view, extra

[PHP-DEV] Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List)

2007-09-10 Thread Gregory Beaver
Andi Gutmans wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of David Coallier >> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 4:05 PM >> To: Andi Gutmans >> Cc: Gregory Beaver; PHP Developers Mailing List >&g

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List

2007-09-10 Thread Andi Gutmans
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of David Coallier > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 4:05 PM > To: Andi Gutmans > Cc: Gregory Beaver; PHP Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested F

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List

2007-09-10 Thread David Coallier
On 9/10/07, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I will ask Dmitry to share it with you. There's huge value in > having a standard format which existing tools can already manipulate. It > doesn't have to be tar but IMO it should be something standard. > > Andi > > > -Original Message-