On Fri Sep 17 03:13 PM, Ralph Schindler wrote:
> Inline response:
>
> On 9/17/10 1:57 PM, Jonathan Bond-Caron wrote:
> > On Fri Sep 17 01:06 PM, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
> >>
> >> Another good example is to map your persistence data into your
> >> Entities. Doctrine 2 implements this and I think t
Inline response:
On 9/17/10 1:57 PM, Jonathan Bond-Caron wrote:
On Fri Sep 17 01:06 PM, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
Another good example is to map your persistence data into your
Entities. Doctrine 2 implements this and I think that way you can
compare easily with the PHP code alternative. I'd lik
On Fri Sep 17 01:06 PM, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
>
> Another good example is to map your persistence data into your
> Entities. Doctrine 2 implements this and I think that way you can
> compare easily with the PHP code alternative. I'd like to ask you to
> compate the same Entity mapped through
On 9/17/10 12:49 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
userspace) 2) adding syntax (probably can't be done in userspace unless
somebody thinks of a clever way to do it).
I've thought of it, and I guess I'll give it a go, I could make this a
proposal if it makes sense to.
The idea is to make the Zend En
Hi!
Unless the PHP parser engine can be extended via normal or zend
extensions, no, it can't. And pretty useless to have annotations
outside the core...
I disagree - it would be very useful *if* we could do that. I.e. if we
could associate data with classes, functions, etc. without actually
Hi Richard,
Comments inline
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
> On 17 September 2010 14:17, Rafael Dohms wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Christian Kaps
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:02:10 +0100, Richard Quadling
>>> wrote:
One thing that did come
On 17 September 2010 14:17, Rafael Dohms wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Christian Kaps
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:02:10 +0100, Richard Quadling
>> wrote:
>>> One thing that did come to mind is if we ignore all the issues and
>>> complexities of actually implementing annotation
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Christian Kaps
wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:02:10 +0100, Richard Quadling
> wrote:
>> One thing that did come to mind is if we ignore all the issues and
>> complexities of actually implementing annotations, are annotations
>> useful to a significant number of u
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:02:10 +0100, Richard Quadling
wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> In trying to follow the annotations threads currently running, I've
> come to realise just how little I understand a LOT of what I read
> here.
>
> But, then again, I don't need to, so hurrah for me. I try to follow,
>
hi,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
> Is this something that can just be an extension with its own evolution?
Unless the PHP parser engine can be extended via normal or zend
extensions, no, it can't. And pretty useless to have annotations
outside the core...
Cheers,
-
10 matches
Mail list logo
