Re: [PHP-DEV] Multi-paradigm design (was: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: __autoloading and functions)

2006-09-10 Thread Derick Rethans
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Terje Slettebø wrote: > > > P.S: As an aside: Why is everybody (?) replying to both the list > > > _and_ the poster? If you post, isn't it safe to assume you're > > > actually on the list, or am I missing something? > > > > It is a common usage here. Some uses nntp, other ma

Re: [PHP-DEV] Multi-paradigm design (was: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: __autoloading and functions)

2006-09-10 Thread Terje Slettebø
Hi Pierre. > > P.S: As an aside: Why is everybody (?) replying to both the list _and_ the > > poster? If you post, isn't it safe to assume you're actually on the list, or > > am I missing something? > > It is a common usage here. Some uses nntp, other mails (and filters, etc..). Ok. It's just th

Re: [PHP-DEV] Multi-paradigm design

2006-09-10 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Terje Slettebø wrote: P.S: As an aside: Why is everybody (?) replying to both the list _and_ the poster? If you post, isn't it safe to assume you're actually on the list, or am I missing something? Many people aren't actually subscribed, the list can be slow at times, and it is nice to have re

Re: [PHP-DEV] Multi-paradigm design (was: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: __autoloading and functions)

2006-09-10 Thread Pierre
Hello, P.S: As an aside: Why is everybody (?) replying to both the list _and_ the poster? If you post, isn't it safe to assume you're actually on the list, or am I missing something? It is a common usage here. Some uses nntp, other mails (and filters, etc..). It is also nice to do not start