2022ๅนด9ๆ3ๆฅ(ๅ) 2:31 Nicolas Grekas :
> Hello everybody, hi Mate
>
> I played with readonly classes recently, to add support for them to
> lazy-loading proxy generation and I struggled upon what I see as serious
> issues.
>
> As noted in the RFC, and because the readonly flag must be set on child
> c
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:57 AM Nicolas Grekas
wrote:
>
> >Hi Marco,
> > >
> > >IMO good as-is: can be relaxed later (8.3 or later), if anybody believes
> > >> it's a show-stopper.
> > >>
> > >Readonly classes don't really need to be lazy.
> > >>
> > >
> > >"Break things and move slow" doesn't feel
>Hi Marco,
> >
> >IMO good as-is: can be relaxed later (8.3 or later), if anybody believes
> >> it's a show-stopper.
> >>
> >Readonly classes don't really need to be lazy.
> >>
> >
> >"Break things and move slow" doesn't feel right to me for the language.
>
> It's a new keyword that you have to opt
On 4 September 2022 11:46:18 BST, Nicolas Grekas
wrote:
>Hi Marco,
>
>IMO good as-is: can be relaxed later (8.3 or later), if anybody believes
>> it's a show-stopper.
>>
>Readonly classes don't really need to be lazy.
>>
>
>"Break things and move slow" doesn't feel right to me for the language.
It doesn't break anything: we have a new limitation, we observe if it is
problematic, we remove that limitation if that is the case.
That already happened for PHP 8.1, although I can't remember the exact
feature.
Let the side wheels attached for now ๐
On Sun, 4 Sep 2022, 12:46 Nicolas Grekas,
w
Hi Marco,
IMO good as-is: can be relaxed later (8.3 or later), if anybody believes
> it's a show-stopper.
>
Readonly classes don't really need to be lazy.
>
"Break things and move slow" doesn't feel right to me for the language.
Maybe you don't see the need for lazy readonly classes, but that's
n
IMO good as-is: can be relaxed later (8.3 or later), if anybody believes
it's a show-stopper.
Readonly classes don't really need to be lazy.
Marco Pivetta
https://twitter.com/Ocramius
https://ocramius.github.io/
On Fri, 2 Sept 2022 at 19:31, Nicolas Grekas
wrote:
> Hello everybody, hi Mate
