Done; thanks for the ping!
cc'ing Nuno, our GCOV guy!
2017-07-18 21:32 GMT+02:00 Sara Golemon :
Looks like I don't have karma to add PHP_7_2 to gcov runs, could
someone do that for me? Thanks.
--
regards,
Kalle Sommer Nielsen
ka...@php.net
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Maili
cc'ing Nuno, our GCOV guy!
2017-07-18 21:32 GMT+02:00 Sara Golemon :
> Looks like I don't have karma to add PHP_7_2 to gcov runs, could
> someone do that for me? Thanks.
--
regards,
Kalle Sommer Nielsen
ka...@php.net
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, vis
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 21:49 +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> BTW, there was an error in your patch: it cleans the *.gcno files (which are
> generated at compile time) in cov_gen_clean() before running lcov, thus
> breaking the proccess.
Opps. I'll fix that when I commit. As soon as we get the parsers
Hello Wez,
i fixed some bugs in re2c since -o was added. Some of those were serious
ones. Whether they affect pdo i cannot tell but for one issue i know that it
may affect ext/standard usage (depending on the compiler iirc). Maybe jani
can recall the reasons why and when we increased the re2c ver
No, I'm not (both not the only one using an older version, nor am I
necessarily using an older version).
Until someone points out a re2c bug that actually impacts PHP, I'm in
no rush to run around upgrading more than 20 machines.
--Wez.
On 8/9/05, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hell
On Aug 9, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Wez Furlong wrote:
JFYI: -o doesn't work on all versions of re2c
Since when has PHP been concerned about not requiring the most-most
recent version of a library, let alone a development tool?
George
--Wez.
On 8/9/05, Nuno Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Wez,
just to remind you: you are the only one using an old unsupport version
that doesn't come with -o.
marcus
Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 10:55:43 PM, you wrote:
> JFYI: -o doesn't work on all versions of re2c
> --Wez.
> On 8/9/05, Nuno Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'v
JFYI: -o doesn't work on all versions of re2c
--Wez.
On 8/9/05, Nuno Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've already had a change to test your patch (I've even have asked my
> university for a server to put ithe reports on-line).
> I've also came into this issue, which happens because re
Hello Nuno,
that's also absolutley correct for most .re'S.
Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 10:49:02 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> I've already had a change to test your patch (I've even have asked my
> university for a server to put ithe reports on-line).
> I've also came into this issue, which happens be
Hello John,
for the .re ones i could simply release re2c 0.9.10 and you use the new
switch we especially made for that. If i knew we were going for 5.1 i had
probably done that at OSCON but i didn't see any action required until just
now.
best regards
marcus
Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 10:44:01 P
Hi,
I've already had a change to test your patch (I've even have asked my
university for a server to put ithe reports on-line).
I've also came into this issue, which happens because re2c is called in the
wrong way (the output is printed to stdout, rather than directly to the
file). Those files
I also wrote one, i don't care which we use... it's a 5 line shell
script :)
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 16:40 -0400, Wez Furlong wrote:
> IIRC, we have a script that does this already for our release
> tarballs; should save some effort.
>
> --Wez.
>
> On 8/9/05, John Coggeshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
IIRC, we have a script that does this already for our release
tarballs; should save some effort.
--Wez.
On 8/9/05, John Coggeshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before we deep-freeze the CVS, I'd like to get my GCOV stuff committed.
> The changes are relatively minor and I've already run it past A
13 matches
Mail list logo
