Hello Markus,
the question alone makes me question if it was worth the effort starting
it :-)
best regards
marcus
Friday, May 19, 2006, 11:23:32 PM, you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Is there an "UPGRADING 5.1 to 5.2"? I think there it would make sense, too.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there an "UPGRADING 5.1 to 5.2"? I think there it would make sense, too.
- - Markus
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> I'll add a note about it to the 5.2 README file.
>
>
> On 19-May-06, at 11:00 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
>
>> Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>>> S
Cool. I just had a horrible vision of hundreds of reports of 'strange
crashes' :)
When E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR is triggers and not handled, it gets translated
to an E_ERROR "Catchable fatal error...".
On 19-May-06, at 12:10 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
Back to my original (off-list) question - what h
When E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR is triggers and not handled, it gets
translated to an E_ERROR "Catchable fatal error...".
On 19-May-06, at 12:10 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
Back to my original (off-list) question - what happens if people
don't have E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR level error reporting switched on?
Back to my original (off-list) question - what happens if people don't have
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR level error reporting switched on? Does it fall back to
E_ERROR or does the code fail silently?
I'll add a note about it to the 5.2 README file.
On 19-May-06, at 11:00 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
Ili
I'll add a note about it to the 5.2 README file.
On 19-May-06, at 11:00 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
So the only affect is that value numeric value of E_ALL is greater
then it was before. Marcus has already applied patch to this
affect a few days ago (Thanks!).
This need
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
So the only affect is that value numeric value of E_ALL is greater then
it was before. Marcus has already applied patch to this affect a few
days ago (Thanks!).
This needs to be made obvious in the release notes or something. Users
that set their error level in apache
